Does referral to a paediatric trauma unit affect outcome

Elisabeth Boddé, M. Dijk, A. B. As
{"title":"Does referral to a paediatric trauma unit affect outcome","authors":"Elisabeth Boddé, M. Dijk, A. B. As","doi":"10.12715/APR.2018.5.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There has been much debate in international literature about whether it is better to treat trauma patients at the injury site, at a nearby facility, or to transport them to a specialized emergency health care facility. Previous studies comparing directly admitted and referred patients showed contradicting results and very few studies focused on children. The aim of this research was to obtain an overview of the potential differences in outcome between directly admitted and referred patients in the setting of the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Methods: A 5-year retrospective medical folder audit was conducted of 209 children admitted to the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital with an abbreviated injury score of three or four. We compared outcomes between directly admitted patients and patients referred from other health institutions. Results: There was no difference in mortality or length of stay of the patients in the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital. Directly admitted patients reached the hospital within a median of 60 minutes (interquartile range, IQR, 52 to 84) compared to 185 minutes (IQR 120 to 302) for referred patients (p<0.01). Conclusions: To shorten delay time for referred patients, the on-field triage system needs to be improved. Also, ambulance personnel need to be trained to perform treatments on site, to replace an initial non-trauma hospital, and transport patients directly to a specialized emergency health care facility.","PeriodicalId":72104,"journal":{"name":"Advances in pediatric research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in pediatric research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12715/APR.2018.5.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been much debate in international literature about whether it is better to treat trauma patients at the injury site, at a nearby facility, or to transport them to a specialized emergency health care facility. Previous studies comparing directly admitted and referred patients showed contradicting results and very few studies focused on children. The aim of this research was to obtain an overview of the potential differences in outcome between directly admitted and referred patients in the setting of the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Methods: A 5-year retrospective medical folder audit was conducted of 209 children admitted to the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital with an abbreviated injury score of three or four. We compared outcomes between directly admitted patients and patients referred from other health institutions. Results: There was no difference in mortality or length of stay of the patients in the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital. Directly admitted patients reached the hospital within a median of 60 minutes (interquartile range, IQR, 52 to 84) compared to 185 minutes (IQR 120 to 302) for referred patients (p<0.01). Conclusions: To shorten delay time for referred patients, the on-field triage system needs to be improved. Also, ambulance personnel need to be trained to perform treatments on site, to replace an initial non-trauma hospital, and transport patients directly to a specialized emergency health care facility.
转到儿科创伤科会影响结果吗
背景:在国际文献中,关于创伤患者是在损伤现场治疗更好,还是在附近的设施治疗更好,还是将他们运送到专门的紧急卫生保健设施,一直存在很多争论。先前的研究比较了直接入院和转诊的患者,结果相互矛盾,而且很少有研究关注儿童。本研究的目的是获得在南非开普敦红十字战争纪念儿童医院直接入院和转诊患者之间潜在结果差异的概述。方法:对209例在红十字战争纪念儿童医院住院的简易损伤评分为3分或4分的儿童进行5年回顾性病历审核。我们比较了直接入院的患者和从其他卫生机构转诊的患者的结局。结果:两组患者在红十字战争纪念儿童医院的死亡率和住院时间无显著差异。直接入院患者到达医院的中位时间为60分钟(四分位数范围,IQR, 52至84),而转诊患者为185分钟(IQR, 120至302)(p<0.01)。结论:为缩短转诊患者的延误时间,需改进现场分诊制度。此外,需要培训救护人员在现场进行治疗,以取代最初的非创伤医院,并将患者直接运送到专门的紧急卫生保健设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信