The Rationally Inattentive Manager

Rongyu Wang
{"title":"The Rationally Inattentive Manager","authors":"Rongyu Wang","doi":"10.13189/AEB.2020.080105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the ordering decisions of a manager who acquires demand information to make inventory decisions. Human beings' cognitive ability in information acquisition is imperfect by nature. We adopt the rational inattention theory to model the information acquisition activity. By reformulating the rational inattention decision problem, we find that rational inattention theory resembles the free energy principle (Friston 2009, 2010) that is used to model brain activities. Therefore, rational inattention theory gets a neurocognitive foundation. We obtain closed-form solutions of the optimal action strategies, which is a discrete distribution although the states are continuous. The process of resulting the optimal action strategies shows that the essence of the process, as a neurocognitive activity, is to think until nothing to think. The optimal action strategies themselves show that an effective thinking is hard to obtain unless think one more step. We also study the impact on decisions once the primitive information is contaminated. If the primitive information is contaminated by, for example, data sampling errors, the acquired information will be eclipsed by the contamination and exhibit certain features that mistaken the ordering decisions by acquiring information if the primitive information were clean. The specific forms of the well-known one-to-one correspondence between action and signal are also restricted by the contamination. We propose an empirical approach to identify the optimal ordering quantities, and the approach works only if the information contamination is separated from the estimation of the unconditional optimal ordering strategies.","PeriodicalId":91438,"journal":{"name":"Advances in economics and business","volume":"8 1","pages":"39-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in economics and business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/AEB.2020.080105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We analyze the ordering decisions of a manager who acquires demand information to make inventory decisions. Human beings' cognitive ability in information acquisition is imperfect by nature. We adopt the rational inattention theory to model the information acquisition activity. By reformulating the rational inattention decision problem, we find that rational inattention theory resembles the free energy principle (Friston 2009, 2010) that is used to model brain activities. Therefore, rational inattention theory gets a neurocognitive foundation. We obtain closed-form solutions of the optimal action strategies, which is a discrete distribution although the states are continuous. The process of resulting the optimal action strategies shows that the essence of the process, as a neurocognitive activity, is to think until nothing to think. The optimal action strategies themselves show that an effective thinking is hard to obtain unless think one more step. We also study the impact on decisions once the primitive information is contaminated. If the primitive information is contaminated by, for example, data sampling errors, the acquired information will be eclipsed by the contamination and exhibit certain features that mistaken the ordering decisions by acquiring information if the primitive information were clean. The specific forms of the well-known one-to-one correspondence between action and signal are also restricted by the contamination. We propose an empirical approach to identify the optimal ordering quantities, and the approach works only if the information contamination is separated from the estimation of the unconditional optimal ordering strategies.
理性疏忽的经理
分析了获取需求信息进行库存决策的管理者的订货决策。人类在信息获取方面的认知能力天生就不完善。我们采用理性不注意理论对信息获取活动进行建模。通过重新阐述理性注意力不集中决策问题,我们发现理性注意力不集中理论类似于用来模拟大脑活动的自由能原理(弗里斯顿2009,2010)。因此,理性注意力不集中理论有神经认知基础。我们得到了最优行动策略的闭型解,它是一个离散分布,尽管状态是连续的。产生最佳行动策略的过程表明,作为一种神经认知活动,该过程的本质是思考,直到无事可想。最佳行动策略本身表明,除非再多想一步,否则很难获得有效的思考。我们还研究了原始信息被污染后对决策的影响。如果原始信息被污染,例如,数据采样错误,获取的信息将被污染,并表现出某些特征,通过获取信息错误的排序决策,如果原始信息是干净的。众所周知,作用和信号之间一对一对应的具体形式也受到污染的限制。我们提出了一种经验方法来识别最优订货量,该方法只有在信息污染与无条件最优订货策略的估计分离的情况下才有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信