Yeshiva Days: Learning on the Lower East Side by Jonathan Boyarin (review)

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Rehan Sayeed
{"title":"Yeshiva Days: Learning on the Lower East Side by Jonathan Boyarin (review)","authors":"Rehan Sayeed","doi":"10.1353/anq.2022.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J Boyarin is a critical anthropologist, a conscientious ethnographer, and an unmatched writer of our time. His recent book, Yeshiva Days: Learning on the Lower East Side, is a compelling and robust ethnography of Mesivtha Tifereth Jerusalem (MTJ), New York’s oldest institution of traditional rabbinical learning. Based on intensive fieldwork at MTJ during his sabbatical year, Boyarin, as an “observant participant” and a “paraethnographer,” builds on his previous work about Jewish communities, the cultural role of scriptural text, as well as the politics of memory and knowledge in order to understand what it means for yeshiva students to study Torah for its own sake. Highlighting the intricacies of dealing with halachaic texts as a primary interlocutor, Boyarin’s Yeshiva Days speaks to a fundamental issue at the heart of anthropology of religion: the relationship between textuality and orthodoxy within the analytic framework of tradition. Given the legitimizing force of authorized texts in the Jewish tradition, Yeshiva Days compels anthropologists and scholars of religion to reconfigure the boundary between the cultural (à la Clifford Geertz) and a more literal text. Situating Boyarin’s motivations and goals, the book’s introduction presents the author’s struggle to find his place in yeshiva as a “secular academic ethnographer” and a “traditional male Jew” wanting to learn Torah (3).1 In Chapter 1, Boyarin gives us a sense of MTJ as a space, both architecturally and liturgically. At the center is the beis medresh, the main study hall where pedagogical and social interactions actively play out. The author then, in Chapter 2, explores MTJ’s relationship with its Lithuanian","PeriodicalId":51536,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Quarterly","volume":"95 1","pages":"703 - 708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2022.0039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

J Boyarin is a critical anthropologist, a conscientious ethnographer, and an unmatched writer of our time. His recent book, Yeshiva Days: Learning on the Lower East Side, is a compelling and robust ethnography of Mesivtha Tifereth Jerusalem (MTJ), New York’s oldest institution of traditional rabbinical learning. Based on intensive fieldwork at MTJ during his sabbatical year, Boyarin, as an “observant participant” and a “paraethnographer,” builds on his previous work about Jewish communities, the cultural role of scriptural text, as well as the politics of memory and knowledge in order to understand what it means for yeshiva students to study Torah for its own sake. Highlighting the intricacies of dealing with halachaic texts as a primary interlocutor, Boyarin’s Yeshiva Days speaks to a fundamental issue at the heart of anthropology of religion: the relationship between textuality and orthodoxy within the analytic framework of tradition. Given the legitimizing force of authorized texts in the Jewish tradition, Yeshiva Days compels anthropologists and scholars of religion to reconfigure the boundary between the cultural (à la Clifford Geertz) and a more literal text. Situating Boyarin’s motivations and goals, the book’s introduction presents the author’s struggle to find his place in yeshiva as a “secular academic ethnographer” and a “traditional male Jew” wanting to learn Torah (3).1 In Chapter 1, Boyarin gives us a sense of MTJ as a space, both architecturally and liturgically. At the center is the beis medresh, the main study hall where pedagogical and social interactions actively play out. The author then, in Chapter 2, explores MTJ’s relationship with its Lithuanian
《叶史瓦的日子:下东区的学习》乔纳森·博亚林著(书评)
J·博雅林是一位批判性的人类学家,一位尽职尽责的民族志学者,也是我们这个时代无与伦比的作家。他的新书《犹太时代:下东区的学习》是一本引人注目的、有力的民族志,讲述了纽约最古老的传统拉比学习机构——耶路撒冷圣殿学院(MTJ)。博雅林在休假期间在MTJ进行了密集的实地考察,作为一名“观察参与者”和“民族志学者”,他在之前关于犹太社区、圣经文本的文化角色、以及记忆和知识的政治的工作基础上,理解了犹太学生为了自己的利益而学习托拉的意义。博雅林的《叶史瓦日》强调了处理作为主要对话者的哈拉查文本的复杂性,它谈到了宗教人类学核心的一个基本问题:在传统的分析框架内,文本性和正统之间的关系。鉴于犹太传统中授权文本的合法化力量,耶史瓦日迫使人类学家和宗教学者重新配置文化文本( la Clifford Geertz)和更字面的文本之间的边界。书的引言将博雅林的动机和目标置于情境中,展现了作者如何努力在犹太历史学院找到自己的位置——一个“世俗的学术人种学家”和一个想要学习托拉的“传统男性犹太人”(3)在第一章中,博亚林给我们一种MTJ作为一个空间的感觉,无论是建筑上的还是礼拜上的。中心是beis medresh,主要的学习大厅,在这里教学和社会互动积极发挥作用。然后,在第二章中,作者探讨了MTJ与其立陶宛的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Since 1921, Anthropological Quarterly has published scholarly articles, review articles, book reviews, and lists of recently published books in all areas of sociocultural anthropology. Its goal is the rapid dissemination of articles that blend precision with humanism, and scrupulous analysis with meticulous description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信