{"title":"What Modals Are: Modal Verbs, Modal Words, and Auxiliary Modals","authors":"F. A. Kakzhanova","doi":"10.13187/ER.2013.61.2530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modals are a complicated grammatical phenomenon. As of today, the status of modals is still not precisely defined in the linguistics literature, and they are described under different names: modal verbs, modal words, auxiliary modals, or defective verbs. Modals express the result of the conversion of thought processes (deep structure) about the realization of actions into surface structure. As articles determine the status of nouns as indefinite or definite things, modals determine the relation of a person to actions or the quality of an action as realizable or unrealizable. Modals cannot truly be ‘modal verbs’, because they lack the morphological characteristics of verbs (aspect, voice, mood, and tense), and the term ‘defective verb’ is flawed for the same reason. Furthermore, they cannot be ‘auxiliary modals’, because they don’t neutralize their main meanings when they become auxiliary. Thus, I propose to refer to these elements only as modals or modal words.","PeriodicalId":30304,"journal":{"name":"Evropejskij Issledovatel''","volume":"61 1","pages":"2530-2535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evropejskij Issledovatel''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13187/ER.2013.61.2530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
The modals are a complicated grammatical phenomenon. As of today, the status of modals is still not precisely defined in the linguistics literature, and they are described under different names: modal verbs, modal words, auxiliary modals, or defective verbs. Modals express the result of the conversion of thought processes (deep structure) about the realization of actions into surface structure. As articles determine the status of nouns as indefinite or definite things, modals determine the relation of a person to actions or the quality of an action as realizable or unrealizable. Modals cannot truly be ‘modal verbs’, because they lack the morphological characteristics of verbs (aspect, voice, mood, and tense), and the term ‘defective verb’ is flawed for the same reason. Furthermore, they cannot be ‘auxiliary modals’, because they don’t neutralize their main meanings when they become auxiliary. Thus, I propose to refer to these elements only as modals or modal words.
情态动词是一种复杂的语法现象。直到今天,在语言学文献中,情态动词的地位仍然没有得到精确的定义,它们被描述为不同的名称:情态动词、情态词、助动词或残缺动词。情态表达了关于行为实现的思维过程(深层结构)向表层结构转化的结果。冠词决定名词作为不确定或确定事物的地位,情态动词决定人与行为的关系或行为的性质是可实现的还是不可实现的。情态动词不可能是真正的“情态动词”,因为它们缺乏动词的形态特征(aspect, voice, mood, and tense),而“有缺陷的动词”一词也是出于同样的原因而有缺陷的。此外,它们不可能是“助动词情态”,因为当它们成为助动词时,它们并没有中和它们的主要意思。因此,我建议将这些要素仅称为情态词或情态词。