{"title":"The Law and Financial Transparency in Churches: Reconsidering the Form 990 Exemption","authors":"J. Montague","doi":"10.13130/1971-8543/4352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most tax-exempt organizations are required to file the IRS Form 990, an information return that is open to the public. The Form 990 is used by watchdogs and donors to learn detailed financial information about charities. However, churches are exempt from filing the Form 990 and need not disclose any financial information to the IRS, the public, or their donors. In December 2012, the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability recommended to Senator Charles Grassley that Congress should preserve the exemption, despite recent financial scandals at churches.Examining the legislative history, this Article argues that the primary function of the information return has become its utility to donors, and policymakers have recognized the role that public access can play in keeping nonprofits honest and efficient. Unfortunately, because churches do not have to be transparent or accountable, few of them are.Using research and insights from sociology, this Article contends that because of their opacity and the unique nature of religious authority, churches are more likely to foster and shelter malfeasance. Churchgoers are unlikely to challenge leaders because doing so can endanger their position in the religious community, making it imperative that transparency be mandated by outside authorities. Ironically, increased transparency may actually be good for churches because, as studies suggest, it is likely to increase donations and because, by minimizing opportunities for financial improprieties, it may preserve the religious experience of churchgoers. In addition, transparency is consistent with the teaching of many Christian leaders and with the expressed preferences of a large portion of churchgoers.","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardozo law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/1971-8543/4352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Most tax-exempt organizations are required to file the IRS Form 990, an information return that is open to the public. The Form 990 is used by watchdogs and donors to learn detailed financial information about charities. However, churches are exempt from filing the Form 990 and need not disclose any financial information to the IRS, the public, or their donors. In December 2012, the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability recommended to Senator Charles Grassley that Congress should preserve the exemption, despite recent financial scandals at churches.Examining the legislative history, this Article argues that the primary function of the information return has become its utility to donors, and policymakers have recognized the role that public access can play in keeping nonprofits honest and efficient. Unfortunately, because churches do not have to be transparent or accountable, few of them are.Using research and insights from sociology, this Article contends that because of their opacity and the unique nature of religious authority, churches are more likely to foster and shelter malfeasance. Churchgoers are unlikely to challenge leaders because doing so can endanger their position in the religious community, making it imperative that transparency be mandated by outside authorities. Ironically, increased transparency may actually be good for churches because, as studies suggest, it is likely to increase donations and because, by minimizing opportunities for financial improprieties, it may preserve the religious experience of churchgoers. In addition, transparency is consistent with the teaching of many Christian leaders and with the expressed preferences of a large portion of churchgoers.
大多数免税组织都需要提交美国国税局990表,这是一份对公众开放的信息申报表。990表是监管机构和捐赠者用来了解慈善机构详细财务信息的表格。然而,教会不需要提交990表格,也不需要向国税局、公众或他们的捐助者披露任何财务信息。2012年12月,福音派财务问责委员会(Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability)向参议员查尔斯·格拉斯利(Charles Grassley)建议,尽管最近教会出现了财务丑闻,但国会应该保留这项豁免。通过对立法历史的考察,本文认为信息回报的主要功能已经成为其对捐助者的效用,决策者已经认识到公众获取在保持非营利组织诚实和高效方面所发挥的作用。不幸的是,因为教会不需要透明或负责,很少有教会做到了。本文运用社会学的研究和见解,认为由于教会的不透明性和宗教权威的独特性,教会更有可能助长和庇护不法行为。教徒不太可能挑战领袖,因为这样做会危及他们在宗教界的地位,因此必须由外部当局强制要求透明度。具有讽刺意味的是,增加透明度实际上可能对教会有好处,因为正如研究表明的那样,这可能会增加捐款,因为通过减少财务不当行为的机会,它可能会保护去教堂的人的宗教体验。此外,透明度与许多基督教领袖的教导和大部分信徒的表达偏好是一致的。