{"title":"L’epiteto οἰκουμενικός nelle firme nominali di ratifica dei patriarchi di Costantinopoli","authors":"Luca Pieralli","doi":"10.13128/SCRINEUM-12152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the nominal signature by which the patriarchs of Constantinople used to ratify documents granting favours in the Middle Ages. Particular attention has been paid to the adoption of the epithet οἰκουμeνικός, which appears in the signature of ratification only during the late Comnenian period, as clearly evidenced by the surviving originals. The opinion, accepted so far by scholars of Byzantine diplomatics, that the adoption of this epithet goes back to the years of Nicene exile is critically discussed and refuted. This opinion is based on an article of Vitalien Laurent, which has been reconsidered in the light of the advancement of the studies on diplomatics in the last decades. We publish here for the first time the pictures of the most ancient granting documents of the Comnenian period, now in the Archives of the Monastery of Saint John the Theologian on Patmos, which are not yet critically edited.","PeriodicalId":29998,"journal":{"name":"Scrineum Rivista","volume":"9 1","pages":"213-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scrineum Rivista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/SCRINEUM-12152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article deals with the nominal signature by which the patriarchs of Constantinople used to ratify documents granting favours in the Middle Ages. Particular attention has been paid to the adoption of the epithet οἰκουμeνικός, which appears in the signature of ratification only during the late Comnenian period, as clearly evidenced by the surviving originals. The opinion, accepted so far by scholars of Byzantine diplomatics, that the adoption of this epithet goes back to the years of Nicene exile is critically discussed and refuted. This opinion is based on an article of Vitalien Laurent, which has been reconsidered in the light of the advancement of the studies on diplomatics in the last decades. We publish here for the first time the pictures of the most ancient granting documents of the Comnenian period, now in the Archives of the Monastery of Saint John the Theologian on Patmos, which are not yet critically edited.
这篇文章讨论了中世纪君士坦丁堡的宗主教用来批准给予恩惠的文件的名义签名。特别注意的是采用了ο ικ ο ο ο μ νικ ο ς这个绰号,它只出现在科米尼晚期的批准书中,现存的原文清楚地证明了这一点。迄今为止,拜占庭外交学者所接受的观点是,这个绰号的采用可以追溯到尼西亚流亡时期,这一观点受到了批判性的讨论和驳斥。这一观点是根据维塔利安·洛朗的一篇文章,根据近几十年来外交研究的进展,对这篇文章进行了重新审视。我们在这里首次公布了科米尼时期最古老的授予文件的图片,这些文件现在保存在帕特莫斯神学家圣约翰修道院的档案中,尚未经过严格的编辑。