New constraints on buried Triassic basins and regional implications for subsurface CO2 storage from the SeisData6 seismic profile across the Southeast Georgia coastal plain
{"title":"New constraints on buried Triassic basins and regional implications for subsurface CO2 storage from the SeisData6 seismic profile across the Southeast Georgia coastal plain","authors":"O. M. Akintunde, C. Knapp, J. Knapp, D. Heffner","doi":"10.1306/EG.10231212008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reprocessing of the SeisData6 coastal plain profile was motivated by the need to provide enhanced subsurface imaging critical to site characterization studies for CO2 storage within the South Georgia Rift (SGR) basin. The objectives were to identify and interpret subsurface reflectors for evidence of the buried Triassic basin and its underlying characteristics. Our new interpretation, supported by analysis of well data, has helped substantiate the presence of a Triassic basin beneath the coastal plain sediments in Southeast Georgia. This basin is approximately 2.2 km (1.7 mi) deep and 170 km (106 mi) wide and appears to coincide with the subsurface convergence of the southwest and northeast extensions of the Riddleville and Dunbarton basins that are subsidiaries of the main SGR. It is characterized by distinctively higher seismic velocities relative to the overlying coastal plain sediments and manifests a series of subhorizontal reflectors below the topmost reflector. We reinterpreted the topmost reflector to originate from a change in velocity and density between the Cretaceous coastal plain sediments and the underlying Triassic rocks. This does not always originate from the Pre-Cretaceous basalt contrary to previous interpretations. The interpreted absence of basalt from this study is consistent with Heffner et al. (2012) showing that basalt is not prevalent throughout the SGR basin. Seismic discontinuities in the southeast of the basin suggest Triassic normal faults. Our data show no clear evidence for the Augusta fault that was identified in other studies in the vicinity of the Piedmont–coastal plain boundary in Georgia and South Carolina.","PeriodicalId":11706,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1306/EG.10231212008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.10231212008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Reprocessing of the SeisData6 coastal plain profile was motivated by the need to provide enhanced subsurface imaging critical to site characterization studies for CO2 storage within the South Georgia Rift (SGR) basin. The objectives were to identify and interpret subsurface reflectors for evidence of the buried Triassic basin and its underlying characteristics. Our new interpretation, supported by analysis of well data, has helped substantiate the presence of a Triassic basin beneath the coastal plain sediments in Southeast Georgia. This basin is approximately 2.2 km (1.7 mi) deep and 170 km (106 mi) wide and appears to coincide with the subsurface convergence of the southwest and northeast extensions of the Riddleville and Dunbarton basins that are subsidiaries of the main SGR. It is characterized by distinctively higher seismic velocities relative to the overlying coastal plain sediments and manifests a series of subhorizontal reflectors below the topmost reflector. We reinterpreted the topmost reflector to originate from a change in velocity and density between the Cretaceous coastal plain sediments and the underlying Triassic rocks. This does not always originate from the Pre-Cretaceous basalt contrary to previous interpretations. The interpreted absence of basalt from this study is consistent with Heffner et al. (2012) showing that basalt is not prevalent throughout the SGR basin. Seismic discontinuities in the southeast of the basin suggest Triassic normal faults. Our data show no clear evidence for the Augusta fault that was identified in other studies in the vicinity of the Piedmont–coastal plain boundary in Georgia and South Carolina.
对SeisData6沿海平原剖面进行再处理的动机是需要提供增强的地下成像,这对南乔治亚裂谷(SGR)盆地内二氧化碳储存的现场表征研究至关重要。目的是识别和解释地下反射物,以寻找埋藏三叠纪盆地及其潜在特征的证据。我们的新解释得到了油井数据分析的支持,帮助证实了乔治亚州东南部沿海平原沉积物下存在三叠纪盆地。该盆地深约2.2公里(1.7英里),宽约170公里(106英里),似乎与主要SGR分支Riddleville和Dunbarton盆地西南和东北延伸的地下汇聚相吻合。它的特点是相对于上覆的海岸平原沉积物而言,地震速度明显更高,并且在最上面的反射体之下表现出一系列的次水平反射体。我们重新解释了最上面的反射物是由白垩纪海岸平原沉积物和其下的三叠纪岩石之间的速度和密度变化引起的。与以前的解释相反,这并不总是源于前白垩纪玄武岩。本研究中玄武岩的缺失与Heffner et al.(2012)一致,表明玄武岩在整个SGR盆地中并不普遍。盆地东南部地震不连续为三叠纪正断层。我们的数据显示,在乔治亚州和南卡罗来纳州皮埃蒙特海岸平原边界附近的其他研究中,没有发现奥古斯塔断层存在的明确证据。