Agrarian Regulation in Colombia, or the Eternal Déjà vu of Concentration and Dispossession: an Analysis of Colombian Legislation on the Agricultural Sector (1991-2010)

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Rocío del Pilar Peña Huertas, María Mónica Parada Hernández, S. Ríos
{"title":"Agrarian Regulation in Colombia, or the Eternal Déjà vu of Concentration and Dispossession: an Analysis of Colombian Legislation on the Agricultural Sector (1991-2010)","authors":"Rocío del Pilar Peña Huertas, María Mónica Parada Hernández, S. Ríos","doi":"10.12804/ESJ16.1.2014.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the institutional framework established in agricultural property legislation from 1991 to 2010 is not based on land distribution but that, on the contrary, it promotes or allows concentration of land ownership. This runs contrary to the thesis that holds that the land issue is a consequence of improper application of rural property regulations. Furthermore, the paper argues that on the issue of rural land, the constitution of 1991, despite its emphasis on guaranteeing rights and despite having changed a large number of social and political structures, preserved the age-old and classic liberal structure of property rights regulated through the Civil Code. Even though the phenomena of concentration and dispossession cannot be explained through legislation alone, it does shed light on these situations. In this order of ideas, an analysis of the legal provisions will be made to establish whether they contain elements designed to contribute to the concentration and dispossession of land in Colombia.","PeriodicalId":40249,"journal":{"name":"Revista Estudios Socio-Juridicos","volume":"16 1","pages":"123-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Estudios Socio-Juridicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12804/ESJ16.1.2014.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper argues that the institutional framework established in agricultural property legislation from 1991 to 2010 is not based on land distribution but that, on the contrary, it promotes or allows concentration of land ownership. This runs contrary to the thesis that holds that the land issue is a consequence of improper application of rural property regulations. Furthermore, the paper argues that on the issue of rural land, the constitution of 1991, despite its emphasis on guaranteeing rights and despite having changed a large number of social and political structures, preserved the age-old and classic liberal structure of property rights regulated through the Civil Code. Even though the phenomena of concentration and dispossession cannot be explained through legislation alone, it does shed light on these situations. In this order of ideas, an analysis of the legal provisions will be made to establish whether they contain elements designed to contribute to the concentration and dispossession of land in Colombia.
哥伦比亚的土地管制,抑或是集中与剥夺的永恒幻影:哥伦比亚农业部门立法分析(1991-2010)
本文认为,1991 - 2010年农业产权立法建立的制度框架并非以土地分配为基础,相反,它促进或允许土地所有权集中。这与认为土地问题是农村财产管理不当的结果的论点背道而驰。此外,本文认为,在农村土地问题上,尽管1991年宪法强调保障权利,尽管改变了大量的社会和政治结构,但保留了由民法典规范的古老而经典的自由产权结构。尽管不能仅通过立法来解释集中和剥夺现象,但它确实说明了这些情况。按照这一顺序,将对法律规定进行分析,以确定它们是否含有旨在助长哥伦比亚土地集中和剥夺的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信