Does methane pose significant health and public safety hazards?—A review

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
I. Duncan
{"title":"Does methane pose significant health and public safety hazards?—A review","authors":"I. Duncan","doi":"10.1306/EG.06191515005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been suggested by some that methane contamination of water wells is the main negative consequence of the development of natural gas resources. Concurrently, speculation in academic white papers and in the press that methane may be toxic has resulted in public concern. In northern Pennsylvania, methane being released from groundwater and entering homes (so-called stray gas) has become a focus of this concern. This phenomenon was widespread decades before shale gas development was initiated. This paper reviews the available literature on the safety and health hazards associated with natural gas. It concludes that the risks to homeowners are highest from flash fires occurring in methane oxygen gas clouds at relatively low methane concentrations collecting in poorly ventilated, confined areas of houses such as basements. Such risks can be mitigated effectively and in most cases at minimal cost. Methane can result in death from hypoxia (lack of oxygen) but only at methane levels in the air of more than 60%, which are unlikely to develop except under exceptional circumstances. There is no evidence that low to moderate levels of exposure to methane in air have any toxic effect on humans, and evidence for such effects at very high levels (already fatal because of hypoxia) is equivocal. It seems likely that methane at concentrations at least as high as 2.5% may well have positive health benefits for some diseases.","PeriodicalId":11706,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1306/EG.06191515005","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1306/EG.06191515005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

It has been suggested by some that methane contamination of water wells is the main negative consequence of the development of natural gas resources. Concurrently, speculation in academic white papers and in the press that methane may be toxic has resulted in public concern. In northern Pennsylvania, methane being released from groundwater and entering homes (so-called stray gas) has become a focus of this concern. This phenomenon was widespread decades before shale gas development was initiated. This paper reviews the available literature on the safety and health hazards associated with natural gas. It concludes that the risks to homeowners are highest from flash fires occurring in methane oxygen gas clouds at relatively low methane concentrations collecting in poorly ventilated, confined areas of houses such as basements. Such risks can be mitigated effectively and in most cases at minimal cost. Methane can result in death from hypoxia (lack of oxygen) but only at methane levels in the air of more than 60%, which are unlikely to develop except under exceptional circumstances. There is no evidence that low to moderate levels of exposure to methane in air have any toxic effect on humans, and evidence for such effects at very high levels (already fatal because of hypoxia) is equivocal. It seems likely that methane at concentrations at least as high as 2.5% may well have positive health benefits for some diseases.
甲烷是否对健康和公共安全造成重大危害?——评论
有人认为,水井的甲烷污染是天然气资源开发的主要负面后果。与此同时,学术白皮书和媒体对甲烷可能有毒的猜测引起了公众的关注。在宾夕法尼亚州北部,地下水释放的甲烷进入家庭(所谓的散失气体)已经成为人们关注的焦点。在页岩气开发开始之前,这种现象已经普遍存在了几十年。本文综述了与天然气有关的安全和健康危害的现有文献。它得出结论,房主面临的风险最高的是发生在甲烷氧气云中,甲烷浓度相对较低,聚集在通风不良的房屋密闭区域,如地下室。这种风险可以有效地减轻,而且在大多数情况下成本最低。甲烷可导致缺氧(缺氧)死亡,但只有在空气中甲烷含量超过60%时才会导致死亡,除非在特殊情况下,这种情况不太可能发生。没有证据表明,低至中等水平的空气甲烷暴露对人类有任何毒性作用,而非常高水平的甲烷暴露(由于缺氧已经致命)对人体有任何毒性作用的证据也不明确。甲烷浓度至少达到2.5%似乎很可能对某些疾病有积极的健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Geosciences
Environmental Geosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信