碳排放与其影响因素之间关系的变化—基于STIRPAT模型的分位数回归分析 The Change of the Relationship between CO2 Emissions and the Driving Forces—Quantile Regression Based on STIRPAT Model

卫锋 阳
{"title":"碳排放与其影响因素之间关系的变化—基于STIRPAT模型的分位数回归分析 The Change of the Relationship between CO2 Emissions and the Driving Forces—Quantile Regression Based on STIRPAT Model","authors":"卫锋 阳","doi":"10.12677/JLCE.2016.53005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"前人很多有关人口、财富、科技和碳排放的关系的研究,都假定人口和财富的生态弹性系数是时间不变和空间不变的。本文基于STIRPAT模型,利用稳健的分位数回归分析了,我们讨论了碳排放与人口、财富和科技的关系在1992~2009年期间的变化情况。主要结果如下:1) 对于财富的生态弹性系数比人口的生态弹性系数大的国家,人口、财富、科技和碳排放的STIRPAT关系变化很小。2) 对于碳排放量相对高的国家,人口是碳排放的主要因素,科技对碳排放总量的影响也大,而碳排放量越高,财富对碳排放的影响越小。3) 对于碳排放量很高的国家,财富的生态弹性系数介于0.65~1.1之间。对于碳排放量较低或很低的国家,财富的生态弹性系数稳定在1.2附近。4) 9个不同分位数回归的科技截距的变化幅度由1992年的8.5缩小到2009的2.8。 In most previous studies of the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology, the ecological elasticities of population and affluence were assumed to be both time invariant and space invariant. Based on the STIRPAT model, by using robust quantile regression, we studied the change of the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology at different CO2 emissions levels during the period 1992-2009. Our main results are as follows: 1) the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology changes slightly in countries where the ecological elasticity of affluence is greater than that of the population. 2) In those countries with relatively high levels of CO2 emissions, higher emissions mean that increases in population and affluence have smaller effects on the impacts of emissions, but technology has a greater effect on those impacts. 3) In those countries with high CO2 emissions, the ecological elasticity of affluence increases from less than 0.65 to 1.1, but in countries with moderate or low CO2 emissions, the ecological elasticity of affluence is stable at approximately 1.2. 4) The shifting scope of the technology intercepts of nine different quantile regression analyses decreases from 8.5 in 1992 to 2.8 in 2009.","PeriodicalId":91573,"journal":{"name":"Low carbon economy","volume":"8 4 1","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Low carbon economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12677/JLCE.2016.53005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

前人很多有关人口、财富、科技和碳排放的关系的研究,都假定人口和财富的生态弹性系数是时间不变和空间不变的。本文基于STIRPAT模型,利用稳健的分位数回归分析了,我们讨论了碳排放与人口、财富和科技的关系在1992~2009年期间的变化情况。主要结果如下:1) 对于财富的生态弹性系数比人口的生态弹性系数大的国家,人口、财富、科技和碳排放的STIRPAT关系变化很小。2) 对于碳排放量相对高的国家,人口是碳排放的主要因素,科技对碳排放总量的影响也大,而碳排放量越高,财富对碳排放的影响越小。3) 对于碳排放量很高的国家,财富的生态弹性系数介于0.65~1.1之间。对于碳排放量较低或很低的国家,财富的生态弹性系数稳定在1.2附近。4) 9个不同分位数回归的科技截距的变化幅度由1992年的8.5缩小到2009的2.8。 In most previous studies of the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology, the ecological elasticities of population and affluence were assumed to be both time invariant and space invariant. Based on the STIRPAT model, by using robust quantile regression, we studied the change of the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology at different CO2 emissions levels during the period 1992-2009. Our main results are as follows: 1) the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology changes slightly in countries where the ecological elasticity of affluence is greater than that of the population. 2) In those countries with relatively high levels of CO2 emissions, higher emissions mean that increases in population and affluence have smaller effects on the impacts of emissions, but technology has a greater effect on those impacts. 3) In those countries with high CO2 emissions, the ecological elasticity of affluence increases from less than 0.65 to 1.1, but in countries with moderate or low CO2 emissions, the ecological elasticity of affluence is stable at approximately 1.2. 4) The shifting scope of the technology intercepts of nine different quantile regression analyses decreases from 8.5 in 1992 to 2.8 in 2009.
碳排放与其影响因素之间关系的变化—基于STIRPAT模型的分位数回归分析 The Change of the Relationship between CO2 Emissions and the Driving Forces—Quantile Regression Based on STIRPAT Model
前人很多有关人口、财富、科技和碳排放的关系的研究,都假定人口和财富的生态弹性系数是时间不变和空间不变的。本文基于STIRPAT模型,利用稳健的分位数回归分析了,我们讨论了碳排放与人口、财富和科技的关系在1992~2009年期间的变化情况。主要结果如下:1) 对于财富的生态弹性系数比人口的生态弹性系数大的国家,人口、财富、科技和碳排放的STIRPAT关系变化很小。2) 对于碳排放量相对高的国家,人口是碳排放的主要因素,科技对碳排放总量的影响也大,而碳排放量越高,财富对碳排放的影响越小。3) 对于碳排放量很高的国家,财富的生态弹性系数介于0.65~1.1之间。对于碳排放量较低或很低的国家,财富的生态弹性系数稳定在1.2附近。4) 9个不同分位数回归的科技截距的变化幅度由1992年的8.5缩小到2009的2.8。 In most previous studies of the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology, the ecological elasticities of population and affluence were assumed to be both time invariant and space invariant. Based on the STIRPAT model, by using robust quantile regression, we studied the change of the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology at different CO2 emissions levels during the period 1992-2009. Our main results are as follows: 1) the relationship between CO2 emissions, population, affluence and technology changes slightly in countries where the ecological elasticity of affluence is greater than that of the population. 2) In those countries with relatively high levels of CO2 emissions, higher emissions mean that increases in population and affluence have smaller effects on the impacts of emissions, but technology has a greater effect on those impacts. 3) In those countries with high CO2 emissions, the ecological elasticity of affluence increases from less than 0.65 to 1.1, but in countries with moderate or low CO2 emissions, the ecological elasticity of affluence is stable at approximately 1.2. 4) The shifting scope of the technology intercepts of nine different quantile regression analyses decreases from 8.5 in 1992 to 2.8 in 2009.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信