How well adapted are accounting students for Bologna? A comparative analysis of learning styles of Spanish social sciences students

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. L. Arquero, Concepción Tejero Rioja
{"title":"How well adapted are accounting students for Bologna? A comparative analysis of learning styles of Spanish social sciences students","authors":"J. L. Arquero, Concepción Tejero Rioja","doi":"10.12795/EDUCADE.2011.I02.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background - University education in Spain is facing a major change in order to converge with the rest of Europe. Among the challenges the new pedagogy is based upon three principles: (I) increased autonomy and involvement of students in their own learning process, (II) active teaching methods and (III) role of the teaching staff as a manager of stimulating learning environments. This new pedagogy added to the development of certain soft skills, demands from students certain personal characteristics. Aims - The present paper compares the learning styles of Spanish university accounting students with colleagues in other social sciences degrees as well as the influence of several personal factors. Instrument and Sample - The instrument used is the Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scale, and the sample is composed by 619 students enrolled in different degrees at the University of Huelva. Results - Results indicate that accounting students present differences in learning styles in comparison with other social sciences students. Other differences were found associated with gender and age.","PeriodicalId":53188,"journal":{"name":"Educade-Revista de Educacion en Contabilidad Finanzas y Administracion de Empresas","volume":"92 1","pages":"145-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educade-Revista de Educacion en Contabilidad Finanzas y Administracion de Empresas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12795/EDUCADE.2011.I02.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background - University education in Spain is facing a major change in order to converge with the rest of Europe. Among the challenges the new pedagogy is based upon three principles: (I) increased autonomy and involvement of students in their own learning process, (II) active teaching methods and (III) role of the teaching staff as a manager of stimulating learning environments. This new pedagogy added to the development of certain soft skills, demands from students certain personal characteristics. Aims - The present paper compares the learning styles of Spanish university accounting students with colleagues in other social sciences degrees as well as the influence of several personal factors. Instrument and Sample - The instrument used is the Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scale, and the sample is composed by 619 students enrolled in different degrees at the University of Huelva. Results - Results indicate that accounting students present differences in learning styles in comparison with other social sciences students. Other differences were found associated with gender and age.
会计专业的学生对博洛尼亚的适应程度如何?西班牙社会科学专业学生学习风格的比较分析
背景——为了与欧洲其他国家接轨,西班牙的大学教育正面临着重大变革。在挑战中,新教学法基于三个原则:(1)增加学生在自己学习过程中的自主权和参与度;(2)积极的教学方法;(3)教师作为激励学习环境的管理者的角色。这种新的教学法增加了某些软技能的发展,要求学生具备某些个人特点。目的-本论文比较了西班牙大学会计专业学生与其他社会科学专业学生的学习风格,以及几个个人因素的影响。工具和样本-使用的工具是Grasha-Reichmann学生学习风格量表,样本由Huelva大学不同学位的619名学生组成。结果-结果表明,与其他社会科学专业的学生相比,会计专业的学生在学习风格上存在差异。其他差异还与性别和年龄有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信