{"title":"Flaws in the system","authors":"James Kirby","doi":"10.1215/9780822371618-127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comments on the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Chambers (William) on whether a defendant who pleaded guilty to storing smuggled tobacco was not liable for the unpaid excise duty on importation and therefore the court had no jurisdiction to make a confiscation order. Criticises the Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office for relying on out-of-date legislation and the Office of Public Sector Information for failing to keep its website up to date. Considers the difficulties for the courts when they seek online statutory law.","PeriodicalId":83199,"journal":{"name":"The New law journal","volume":"159 1","pages":"649-649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371618-127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Comments on the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v Chambers (William) on whether a defendant who pleaded guilty to storing smuggled tobacco was not liable for the unpaid excise duty on importation and therefore the court had no jurisdiction to make a confiscation order. Criticises the Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office for relying on out-of-date legislation and the Office of Public Sector Information for failing to keep its website up to date. Considers the difficulties for the courts when they seek online statutory law.