Assessing cyclists' routing preferences by analyzing extensive user setting data from a bike-routing engine.

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术
European Transport Research Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-27 DOI:10.1186/s12544-021-00499-x
Michael Hardinghaus, Simon Nieland
{"title":"Assessing cyclists' routing preferences by analyzing extensive user setting data from a bike-routing engine.","authors":"Michael Hardinghaus, Simon Nieland","doi":"10.1186/s12544-021-00499-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many municipalities aim to support the uptake of cycling as an environmentally friendly and healthy mode of transport. It is therefore crucial to meet the demand of cyclists when adapting road infrastructure. Previous studies researching cyclists' route choice behavior deliver valuable insights but are constrained by laboratory conditions, limitations in the number of observations, or the observation period or relay on specific use cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study analyzes a dataset of over 450,000 observations of cyclists' routing settings for the navigation of individual trips in Berlin, Germany. It therefore analyzes query data recorded in the bike-routing engine BBBike and clusters the many different user settings with regard to preferred route characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>Results condense the large number of routing settings into characteristic preference clusters. Compared with earlier findings, the big data approach highlights the significance of short routes, side streets and the importance of high-quality surfaces for routing choices, while cycling on dedicated facilities seems a little less important.Consequentially, providing separated cycle facilities along main roads - often the main focal point of cycle plans - should be put into the context of an integrated strategy which fulfills distinct preferences to achieve greater success. It is therefore particularly important to provide a cycle network in calm residential streets as well as catering for short, direct cycle routes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48671,"journal":{"name":"European Transport Research Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8314267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transport Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00499-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many municipalities aim to support the uptake of cycling as an environmentally friendly and healthy mode of transport. It is therefore crucial to meet the demand of cyclists when adapting road infrastructure. Previous studies researching cyclists' route choice behavior deliver valuable insights but are constrained by laboratory conditions, limitations in the number of observations, or the observation period or relay on specific use cases.

Methods: The present study analyzes a dataset of over 450,000 observations of cyclists' routing settings for the navigation of individual trips in Berlin, Germany. It therefore analyzes query data recorded in the bike-routing engine BBBike and clusters the many different user settings with regard to preferred route characteristics.

Results and conclusion: Results condense the large number of routing settings into characteristic preference clusters. Compared with earlier findings, the big data approach highlights the significance of short routes, side streets and the importance of high-quality surfaces for routing choices, while cycling on dedicated facilities seems a little less important.Consequentially, providing separated cycle facilities along main roads - often the main focal point of cycle plans - should be put into the context of an integrated strategy which fulfills distinct preferences to achieve greater success. It is therefore particularly important to provide a cycle network in calm residential streets as well as catering for short, direct cycle routes.

通过分析自行车路线引擎的大量用户设置数据,评估骑车人的路线偏好。
导言:许多市政当局都希望将自行车作为一种环保、健康的交通方式加以推广。因此,在改造道路基础设施时,满足骑车人的需求至关重要。以往对骑车人路线选择行为的研究提供了有价值的见解,但受到实验室条件、观察次数或观察时间的限制,或只针对特定使用情况:本研究分析了一个数据集,该数据集包含超过 450,000 个关于德国柏林骑车人单次出行导航路线设置的观测数据。因此,本研究分析了自行车路线引擎 BBBike 中记录的查询数据,并根据首选路线特征对许多不同的用户设置进行了分组:结果和结论:结果将大量的路线设置浓缩为具有特征的偏好集群。与之前的研究结果相比,大数据方法凸显了短途路线、支路和高质量路面对路线选择的重要性,而在专用设施上骑行的重要性似乎稍逊一筹。因此,在主干道(通常是自行车计划的主要焦点)沿线提供分离式自行车设施,应纳入满足不同偏好的综合战略中,以取得更大的成功。因此,在平静的住宅区街道提供自行车网络以及满足短途、直接自行车路线的需求尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Transport Research Review
European Transport Research Review Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: European Transport Research Review (ETRR) is a peer-reviewed open access journal publishing original high-quality scholarly research and developments in areas related to transportation science, technologies, policy and practice. Established in 2008 by the European Conference of Transport Research Institutes (ECTRI), the Journal provides researchers and practitioners around the world with an authoritative forum for the dissemination and critical discussion of new ideas and methodologies that originate in, or are of special interest to, the European transport research community. The journal is unique in its field, as it covers all modes of transport and addresses both the engineering and the social science perspective, offering a truly multidisciplinary platform for researchers, practitioners, engineers and policymakers. ETRR is aimed at a readership including researchers, practitioners in the design and operation of transportation systems, and policymakers at the international, national, regional and local levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信