“I have never known such undisguised arson”: The Ladysmith Rag, the Mafeking Bonfire and the Battle for Order in Late Nineteenth-Century Cambridge

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Seán Lang
{"title":"“I have never known such undisguised arson”: The Ladysmith Rag, the Mafeking Bonfire and the Battle for Order in Late Nineteenth-Century Cambridge","authors":"Seán Lang","doi":"10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The celebrations in Cambridge to welcome the relief of Ladysmith in March 1900 took the form of a huge illegal bonfire erected in the town market place by students and townspeople, fed by wood taken without permission from public and private buildings in the city and accompanied by a firework fight. This was the third such bonfire to be lit in the market place in almost as many years, the first two prompted by the university’s rejection of degrees for women in 1897 and by a visit to Cambridge by Lord Kitchener in 1898, and it therefore contributed to a rapidly-developing crisis over the extent and effectiveness of the control exercised at street level by both the city and the university authorities. The controversy sparked off by the relief of Ladysmith gave particular importance to the preparations being made for the expected relief of Mafeking later in the year, which became the vehicle for an effective reassertion of authority and control by the city council. The article also considers the way in which the bonfires reflected conflicting perceptions of masculinity and the long-running rivalry between the university and the town.","PeriodicalId":37727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Regional and Local History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000014","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Regional and Local History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The celebrations in Cambridge to welcome the relief of Ladysmith in March 1900 took the form of a huge illegal bonfire erected in the town market place by students and townspeople, fed by wood taken without permission from public and private buildings in the city and accompanied by a firework fight. This was the third such bonfire to be lit in the market place in almost as many years, the first two prompted by the university’s rejection of degrees for women in 1897 and by a visit to Cambridge by Lord Kitchener in 1898, and it therefore contributed to a rapidly-developing crisis over the extent and effectiveness of the control exercised at street level by both the city and the university authorities. The controversy sparked off by the relief of Ladysmith gave particular importance to the preparations being made for the expected relief of Mafeking later in the year, which became the vehicle for an effective reassertion of authority and control by the city council. The article also considers the way in which the bonfires reflected conflicting perceptions of masculinity and the long-running rivalry between the university and the town.
“我从未见过如此赤裸裸的纵火案”:19世纪晚期剑桥的史密斯夫人、梅金篝火和秩序之战
1900年3月,剑桥市为迎接“史密斯夫人”获释而举行了庆祝活动,学生和市民在镇上的集市上非法燃起了一堆篝火,燃烧的木柴未经允许从市内的公共和私人建筑中取用,并燃放了烟花。这是差不多同样多年来第三次在市场上点燃这样的篝火,前两次是由1897年剑桥大学拒绝授予女性学位和1898年基奇纳勋爵访问剑桥引起的,因此,这导致了一场迅速发展的危机,即城市和大学当局在街道一级实施的控制的范围和有效性。对Ladysmith的解救引发的争议使得为今年晚些时候对maefking的预期解救所做的准备工作变得尤为重要,这成为市议会有效重申权威和控制的工具。文章还认为,篝火反映了人们对男子气概的相互矛盾的看法,以及大学和城镇之间长期存在的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Regional and Local History aims to publish high-quality academic articles which address the history of regions and localities in the medieval, early-modern and modern eras. Regional and local are defined in broad terms, encouraging their examination in both urban and rural contexts, and as administrative, cultural and geographical entities. Regional histories may transcend both local and national boundaries, and offer a means of interrogating the temporality of such structures. Such histories might broaden understandings arrived at through a national focus or help develop agendas for future exploration. The subject matter of regional and local histories invites a number of methodological approaches including oral history, comparative history, cultural history and history from below. We welcome contributions situated in these methodological frameworks but are also keen to elicit inter-disciplinary work which seeks to understand the history of regions or localities through the methodologies of geography, sociology or cultural studies. The journal also publishes book reviews and review articles on themes relating to regional or local history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信