{"title":"Beadles, Dunghills and Noisome Excrements: Regulating the Environment in Seventeenth-Century Carlisle","authors":"Leona J. Skelton","doi":"10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the current, popular, historical imagination, early modern British towns have become synonymous with images of the contents of chamber pots being thrown from windows onto streets and other public spaces below. This article provides an in-depth case study of how waste was produced, disposed of, and regulated in seventeenth-century Carlisle, including the regulation of so-called “noxious trades”, such as tannery, skinning, and butchery. It reveals that far from the common misconception, that urban inhabitants were disinclined to establish and maintain a sanitary standard in the outdoor public spaces in which they lived and worked, Carlisle’s inhabitants, Carlisle Corporation, and the city’s Court Leet Jurors invested considerable time, money, and effort into cleaning the streets, ensuring the sewers flowed efficiently and that dung and other “rubbidge” was carted out of the city. Some townspeople flouted by-laws and created malodorous, insanitary nuisances, but they constituted only a relatively small minority of Carlisle’s population. The article is split into two sections. The first describes how waste was produced in seventeenth-century Carlisle and the waste-disposal facilities and systems that were available to inhabitants. The second section explains the symmetry between Carlisle Corporation and inhabitants’ efforts to maintain outdoor cleanliness, the socio-economic context of adherence to sanitation by-laws (by relating Court Leet presentments to Hearth Tax data), and how waste management changed over time.","PeriodicalId":37727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Regional and Local History","volume":"9 1","pages":"44 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000013","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Regional and Local History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/2051453014Z.00000000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract In the current, popular, historical imagination, early modern British towns have become synonymous with images of the contents of chamber pots being thrown from windows onto streets and other public spaces below. This article provides an in-depth case study of how waste was produced, disposed of, and regulated in seventeenth-century Carlisle, including the regulation of so-called “noxious trades”, such as tannery, skinning, and butchery. It reveals that far from the common misconception, that urban inhabitants were disinclined to establish and maintain a sanitary standard in the outdoor public spaces in which they lived and worked, Carlisle’s inhabitants, Carlisle Corporation, and the city’s Court Leet Jurors invested considerable time, money, and effort into cleaning the streets, ensuring the sewers flowed efficiently and that dung and other “rubbidge” was carted out of the city. Some townspeople flouted by-laws and created malodorous, insanitary nuisances, but they constituted only a relatively small minority of Carlisle’s population. The article is split into two sections. The first describes how waste was produced in seventeenth-century Carlisle and the waste-disposal facilities and systems that were available to inhabitants. The second section explains the symmetry between Carlisle Corporation and inhabitants’ efforts to maintain outdoor cleanliness, the socio-economic context of adherence to sanitation by-laws (by relating Court Leet presentments to Hearth Tax data), and how waste management changed over time.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Regional and Local History aims to publish high-quality academic articles which address the history of regions and localities in the medieval, early-modern and modern eras. Regional and local are defined in broad terms, encouraging their examination in both urban and rural contexts, and as administrative, cultural and geographical entities. Regional histories may transcend both local and national boundaries, and offer a means of interrogating the temporality of such structures. Such histories might broaden understandings arrived at through a national focus or help develop agendas for future exploration. The subject matter of regional and local histories invites a number of methodological approaches including oral history, comparative history, cultural history and history from below. We welcome contributions situated in these methodological frameworks but are also keen to elicit inter-disciplinary work which seeks to understand the history of regions or localities through the methodologies of geography, sociology or cultural studies. The journal also publishes book reviews and review articles on themes relating to regional or local history.