{"title":"Comic Epitaphs: Lucian, Scudéry, and Boileau","authors":"David Harrison","doi":"10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article seeks to redefine the relationship between Boileau’s Dialogue des héros de roman and Madeleine de Scudéry’s Clélie. While Boileau wishes to use his text to erase Scudéry from memory, a close reading of the Dialogue and its Lucianic model reveals Scudéry’s influence on Boileau’s wit. Indeed, the character of Amilcar from Clélie embodies the spirit of Lucianic satire that Boileau hopes to use against Scudéry. Ultimately, Boileau is indebted to a form of enjouement that is inscribed within and popularized by Clélie, and it is this debt that Boileau tries unsuccessfully to make his reader forget in his Dialogue.","PeriodicalId":88312,"journal":{"name":"Seventeenth-century French studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"38 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000021","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventeenth-century French studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract This article seeks to redefine the relationship between Boileau’s Dialogue des héros de roman and Madeleine de Scudéry’s Clélie. While Boileau wishes to use his text to erase Scudéry from memory, a close reading of the Dialogue and its Lucianic model reveals Scudéry’s influence on Boileau’s wit. Indeed, the character of Amilcar from Clélie embodies the spirit of Lucianic satire that Boileau hopes to use against Scudéry. Ultimately, Boileau is indebted to a form of enjouement that is inscribed within and popularized by Clélie, and it is this debt that Boileau tries unsuccessfully to make his reader forget in his Dialogue.
摘要本文试图重新界定布瓦洛的《关于hsamros de roman的对话》与玛德莱娜·德·斯库德萨里的《clsamlie》之间的关系。虽然布瓦洛希望用他的文字抹去人们对斯库德姆斯的记忆,但仔细阅读《对话》及其卢西亚式的模式,就会发现斯库德姆斯对布瓦洛的智慧产生了影响。事实上,来自cludsamry的Amilcar这个角色体现了卢西亚式的讽刺精神,而这正是布瓦洛希望用来反对scudsamry的。最终,布瓦洛要感谢一种被克莱姆列铭记并发扬光大的参与形式,这是布瓦洛在《对话录》中试图让读者忘记的,但没有成功。