{"title":"Preliminary remarks on Pascal’s Écrits sur la grâce","authors":"R. Parish","doi":"10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The volume’s first introductory essay shows how the Écrits sur la grâce throw up many challenges and puzzles for the reader, while still revolving around a core set of problems and definitions. The first is the attempt to situate Augustinian teaching on grace in the middle (and by implication orthodox) ground between Calvinism and (neo-)Pelagianism, in a way which appeals both to authority and to common sense; the second is to underline the double nature both of finding and of losing grace in a range of co-operative sequences. Finally there are the linked imperatives of ignorance and incuriosity, allowing Pascal to conclude only that the gift of grace or its lack is due to ‘un jugement juste quoique caché’, without which mystery the hubristic risk of antinomianism becomes all too apparent.","PeriodicalId":88312,"journal":{"name":"Seventeenth-century French studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"101 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventeenth-century French studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The volume’s first introductory essay shows how the Écrits sur la grâce throw up many challenges and puzzles for the reader, while still revolving around a core set of problems and definitions. The first is the attempt to situate Augustinian teaching on grace in the middle (and by implication orthodox) ground between Calvinism and (neo-)Pelagianism, in a way which appeals both to authority and to common sense; the second is to underline the double nature both of finding and of losing grace in a range of co-operative sequences. Finally there are the linked imperatives of ignorance and incuriosity, allowing Pascal to conclude only that the gift of grace or its lack is due to ‘un jugement juste quoique caché’, without which mystery the hubristic risk of antinomianism becomes all too apparent.
该卷的第一篇介绍性文章显示了Écrits sur la grance如何为读者抛出许多挑战和难题,同时仍然围绕着一组核心问题和定义。第一种是试图将奥古斯丁关于恩典的教导置于加尔文主义和(新)伯拉纠主义之间的中间地带(暗示是正统的),以一种既诉诸权威又诉诸常识的方式;其次是强调在一系列合作序列中发现和失去优雅的双重本质。最后,无知和不好奇是相互关联的,这使得帕斯卡只能得出结论:恩典的恩赐或缺乏是由于“不加判断的正义”,没有这种神秘性,反律法主义的傲慢风险就变得太明显了。