The Birth of Prestressing? Iron Bridges for Railways 1830 to 1850

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
J. Sutherland
{"title":"The Birth of Prestressing? Iron Bridges for Railways 1830 to 1850","authors":"J. Sutherland","doi":"10.1179/175812009X407213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new railways in Robert Stephenson's day needed many slim bridges with flat soffits. Simple cast iron beams sufficed for short spans but problems arose with jointing of castings for longer ones. A solution, with wrought iron ties added to bolted castings, seemed ideal and was widely adopted. The misconception with this scheme was not realised until after the disastrous failure of Stephenson's Dee Bridge at Chester in 1847. A major inquiry followed and extensive remedial work. New bridge forms emerged, notably Fairbairn's ungainly wrought plate girders. Charles Wild's development from the failed system was another. Here Wild successfully used the principle of prestressing on cast iron, some 80 years before Freyssinet 'introduced' it with concrete in the 1930s. Fairbairn's thinking had a wide following but the only application of Wild's design was his neatly detailed bridge over the Arno. Was Wild too far ahead of his time?","PeriodicalId":53171,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for the History of Engineering and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/175812009X407213","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for the History of Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/175812009X407213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The new railways in Robert Stephenson's day needed many slim bridges with flat soffits. Simple cast iron beams sufficed for short spans but problems arose with jointing of castings for longer ones. A solution, with wrought iron ties added to bolted castings, seemed ideal and was widely adopted. The misconception with this scheme was not realised until after the disastrous failure of Stephenson's Dee Bridge at Chester in 1847. A major inquiry followed and extensive remedial work. New bridge forms emerged, notably Fairbairn's ungainly wrought plate girders. Charles Wild's development from the failed system was another. Here Wild successfully used the principle of prestressing on cast iron, some 80 years before Freyssinet 'introduced' it with concrete in the 1930s. Fairbairn's thinking had a wide following but the only application of Wild's design was his neatly detailed bridge over the Arno. Was Wild too far ahead of his time?
预应力的诞生?铁桥铁路1830年至1850年
罗伯特·斯蒂芬森时代的新铁路需要许多倾斜平坦的细长桥梁。简单的铸铁梁足够用于短跨度,但对于较长的跨度,铸件的接合出现了问题。一种解决方案是在螺栓铸件中加入熟铁带,这似乎是理想的,并被广泛采用。直到1847年斯蒂芬森在切斯特的迪桥(Dee Bridge)的灾难性失败之后,人们才意识到对这一计划的误解。随后进行了一次重大调查和广泛的补救工作。新的桥梁形式出现了,尤其是费尔贝恩笨拙的锻造板梁。查尔斯·怀尔德从失败的系统中发展出来是另一个例子。在这里,Wild成功地在铸铁上使用了预应力原理,比Freyssinet在20世纪30年代“引入”混凝土的原理早了80年。费尔贝恩的想法有广泛的追随者,但怀尔德的设计的唯一应用是他在阿诺河上建造的精致的桥梁。怀尔德是不是太超前了?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for the History of Engineering and Technology
International Journal for the History of Engineering and Technology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信