Enhancing Students’ Skills in Applying Theory Through Collaborative and Active Learning: A Pre-Post Evaluation of an Innovative Theory Course for Graduate Public Health Students
Robin E. McGee, E. Walker, Colleen M. McBride, E. Nehl, Whitney S. Rice, Nicolette E. Wise, Carla Jones-Harrell, D. Lang
{"title":"Enhancing Students’ Skills in Applying Theory Through Collaborative and Active Learning: A Pre-Post Evaluation of an Innovative Theory Course for Graduate Public Health Students","authors":"Robin E. McGee, E. Walker, Colleen M. McBride, E. Nehl, Whitney S. Rice, Nicolette E. Wise, Carla Jones-Harrell, D. Lang","doi":"10.1177/23733799231186637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern public health practice includes planning, implementation, and evaluation of programs targeting the structural and social determinants of health. To prepare graduate students to engage with theory in complex, practical, and innovative ways, a new model of course delivery was created to focus on developing and applying theorizing skills to the social ecological model. Throughout the semester, students engage in collaborative learning to apply theory to real-world public health interventions focused on high-profile public health issues. Data were gleaned from three course sections ( N = 80) using a pre-post study design to evaluate students’ ability to apply theory at various levels of the social ecological model and confidence to meet course objectives. The post-course survey also included questions about the helpfulness of specific course elements and asked for recommendations for improvement. Descriptive statistics were calculated and differences between pre- and post-ratings were tested with paired samples t-tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Students improved in their ability to apply theory by the end of the semester ( p < .001) and in their confidence in meeting all learning objectives ( p < .001). Most students found that this new format of engaging with theory in complex, applied, and innovative ways by working in teams, completing in-class activities, and open poster presentations beneficial. Engaging students in a new course format led to critical reflection about various levels of influence on health and enhanced students’ ability to apply theory at multiple levels of influence. Further refinement and course development will continue to facilitate developing theorizing skills.","PeriodicalId":29769,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy in Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy in Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799231186637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Modern public health practice includes planning, implementation, and evaluation of programs targeting the structural and social determinants of health. To prepare graduate students to engage with theory in complex, practical, and innovative ways, a new model of course delivery was created to focus on developing and applying theorizing skills to the social ecological model. Throughout the semester, students engage in collaborative learning to apply theory to real-world public health interventions focused on high-profile public health issues. Data were gleaned from three course sections ( N = 80) using a pre-post study design to evaluate students’ ability to apply theory at various levels of the social ecological model and confidence to meet course objectives. The post-course survey also included questions about the helpfulness of specific course elements and asked for recommendations for improvement. Descriptive statistics were calculated and differences between pre- and post-ratings were tested with paired samples t-tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Students improved in their ability to apply theory by the end of the semester ( p < .001) and in their confidence in meeting all learning objectives ( p < .001). Most students found that this new format of engaging with theory in complex, applied, and innovative ways by working in teams, completing in-class activities, and open poster presentations beneficial. Engaging students in a new course format led to critical reflection about various levels of influence on health and enhanced students’ ability to apply theory at multiple levels of influence. Further refinement and course development will continue to facilitate developing theorizing skills.