Evidence, insight, or intuition? Investment decisions in the commissioning of prevention services for older people

Robin Miller, Iestyn Williams, Kerry Allen, J. Glasby
{"title":"Evidence, insight, or intuition? Investment decisions in the commissioning of prevention services for older people","authors":"Robin Miller, Iestyn Williams, Kerry Allen, J. Glasby","doi":"10.1179/1750168714Y.0000000027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractEnglish adult social care commissioners are expected to make ‘evidence based’ decisions on how best to invest public sector funding. This study explores the types of evidence that commissioners use in relation to prevention services for older people and the other factors that influence their investment decisions. A study of local authority Directors of Adult Social Services (DASSs) was used to identify three local prevention interventions. Semi-structured interviews with leads for these interventions explored the evidence and other factors that influenced the investment process. Commissioners drew on a variety of published evidence, in particular that deriving from central government and its regional representative bodies, and third sector organizations with specialist knowledge. Local evidence was also generated through the undertaking of pilots and gathering of performance data. Alongside these ‘rational’ decision-making processes were strong political, personal, and relational dimensions relate...","PeriodicalId":89406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of care services management","volume":"7 1","pages":"119-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/1750168714Y.0000000027","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of care services management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1750168714Y.0000000027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

AbstractEnglish adult social care commissioners are expected to make ‘evidence based’ decisions on how best to invest public sector funding. This study explores the types of evidence that commissioners use in relation to prevention services for older people and the other factors that influence their investment decisions. A study of local authority Directors of Adult Social Services (DASSs) was used to identify three local prevention interventions. Semi-structured interviews with leads for these interventions explored the evidence and other factors that influenced the investment process. Commissioners drew on a variety of published evidence, in particular that deriving from central government and its regional representative bodies, and third sector organizations with specialist knowledge. Local evidence was also generated through the undertaking of pilots and gathering of performance data. Alongside these ‘rational’ decision-making processes were strong political, personal, and relational dimensions relate...
证据,洞察力,还是直觉?为老年人提供预防服务的投资决策
摘要:英国成人社会保健专员有望就如何最好地投资公共部门资金做出“基于证据”的决定。本研究探讨了专员在老年人预防服务方面使用的证据类型以及影响其投资决策的其他因素。一项对地方当局成人社会服务主任(dass)的研究被用来确定三种地方预防干预措施。与这些干预措施的负责人进行的半结构化访谈探讨了影响投资过程的证据和其他因素。委员们借鉴了各种已公布的证据,特别是来自中央政府及其地区代表机构以及具有专业知识的第三部门组织的证据。通过开展试点和收集执行情况数据,也产生了当地证据。除了这些“理性”的决策过程之外,还有强烈的政治、个人和关系维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书