Libricide: the regime sponsored destruction of books and libraries in the twentieth century

H. Anghelescu
{"title":"Libricide: the regime sponsored destruction of books and libraries in the twentieth century","authors":"H. Anghelescu","doi":"10.1179/lib.2004.20.3.239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book stresses the dichotomy: book destruction by 'natural' disasters such as floods, earthquakes, and tornadoes versus book destruction by human agents as a result of systematic looting, bombing, and burning. If the former cannot be avoided in most cases, the latter involves a deliberate violent act, a barbaric attack by humans against human culture. 'Libricide' implies slaughter. Rebecca Knuth, Associate Professor at the Library and Information Science Program, University of Hawaii Manoa, chose this term to designate 'large-scale, regime-sanctioned destruction of books and libraries, purposeful initiatives that were designed to advance shortand long-term ideologically driven goals' (p. viii) during the twentieth century. Equating libricide to genocide and ethnocide, the author analyzes cases of intentional book 'killings' within the context of socio-cultural violations committed during periods of war or civil unrest. The reasons libraries have become targets of extreme violence is that they stand for symbols of national cultural identity, they are repositories of local history and collective memory, they represent belief systems, and they reflect the development of a society at a certain point in time. Totalitarian regimes perceive library collections as tools that can undermine or reinforce the ideology of a ruling class or party. When libraries are seen as potential enemies adverse to political goals and missions of authoritarian governments' they become candidates for vandalism, decimation, and pillage. Knuth considers censorship as a form of knowledge massacre. The use of governmentsponsored censorship with the purpose to extinguish culture is discussed through case studies from various parts of the world; from Nazi Germany during World War II, when Hitler's regime 'purified' libraries of Jewish texts and 'looted, destroyed and pulped' libraries of Germanoccupied territories as part of a well designed strategy to create a homogeneous state, to Maoist China during the Chinese Cultural Revolution aimed at a wide-scale dissemination of Marxist literature to serve the propagandistic efforts for mass indoctrination. Illustrations of atrocities committed against book collections by the Chinese communists in Tibet to eradicate the deeply rooted traditional culture, by the Iraqis in Kuwait during the six-month occupation during the first Gulf War when 43 per cent of the book collections in this country were slaughtered, and by the Serbs in Bosnia where the cultural heritage of the Bosnian Muslim, Croats, and Slovenes was reduced to nothing, constitute the background for the development of Knuth's theoretical framework for libricide. In her view, the development of a society and of a culture is reflected in the growth of libraries, thus the disappearance of libraries stands for the decay of a culture. She does not agree with other theoreticians who see annihilation as part of acyclicprocess, where decline may trigger stages of intellectual rebirth and growth as a society recovers from a disaster. The long-term effects of destruction of library collections have repercussions over several generations. Beyond the physical spoliation of· books, manuscripts, maps, photographs, and archival records, there is the immaterial and more difficult to assess outcome the curtailment of access to the intellectual content of the lost documents, the inability of scholars and of the public at large to get knowledge out of a public good such as books in a library. One cannot assign a real monetary value to library and archival collections vanished as a result of deliberate vandalism. The extent of material and moral damage caused by acts of aggression against intellectual and cultural objects is not quantifiable.","PeriodicalId":81856,"journal":{"name":"Library history","volume":"20 1","pages":"239 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/lib.2004.20.3.239","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/lib.2004.20.3.239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This book stresses the dichotomy: book destruction by 'natural' disasters such as floods, earthquakes, and tornadoes versus book destruction by human agents as a result of systematic looting, bombing, and burning. If the former cannot be avoided in most cases, the latter involves a deliberate violent act, a barbaric attack by humans against human culture. 'Libricide' implies slaughter. Rebecca Knuth, Associate Professor at the Library and Information Science Program, University of Hawaii Manoa, chose this term to designate 'large-scale, regime-sanctioned destruction of books and libraries, purposeful initiatives that were designed to advance shortand long-term ideologically driven goals' (p. viii) during the twentieth century. Equating libricide to genocide and ethnocide, the author analyzes cases of intentional book 'killings' within the context of socio-cultural violations committed during periods of war or civil unrest. The reasons libraries have become targets of extreme violence is that they stand for symbols of national cultural identity, they are repositories of local history and collective memory, they represent belief systems, and they reflect the development of a society at a certain point in time. Totalitarian regimes perceive library collections as tools that can undermine or reinforce the ideology of a ruling class or party. When libraries are seen as potential enemies adverse to political goals and missions of authoritarian governments' they become candidates for vandalism, decimation, and pillage. Knuth considers censorship as a form of knowledge massacre. The use of governmentsponsored censorship with the purpose to extinguish culture is discussed through case studies from various parts of the world; from Nazi Germany during World War II, when Hitler's regime 'purified' libraries of Jewish texts and 'looted, destroyed and pulped' libraries of Germanoccupied territories as part of a well designed strategy to create a homogeneous state, to Maoist China during the Chinese Cultural Revolution aimed at a wide-scale dissemination of Marxist literature to serve the propagandistic efforts for mass indoctrination. Illustrations of atrocities committed against book collections by the Chinese communists in Tibet to eradicate the deeply rooted traditional culture, by the Iraqis in Kuwait during the six-month occupation during the first Gulf War when 43 per cent of the book collections in this country were slaughtered, and by the Serbs in Bosnia where the cultural heritage of the Bosnian Muslim, Croats, and Slovenes was reduced to nothing, constitute the background for the development of Knuth's theoretical framework for libricide. In her view, the development of a society and of a culture is reflected in the growth of libraries, thus the disappearance of libraries stands for the decay of a culture. She does not agree with other theoreticians who see annihilation as part of acyclicprocess, where decline may trigger stages of intellectual rebirth and growth as a society recovers from a disaster. The long-term effects of destruction of library collections have repercussions over several generations. Beyond the physical spoliation of· books, manuscripts, maps, photographs, and archival records, there is the immaterial and more difficult to assess outcome the curtailment of access to the intellectual content of the lost documents, the inability of scholars and of the public at large to get knowledge out of a public good such as books in a library. One cannot assign a real monetary value to library and archival collections vanished as a result of deliberate vandalism. The extent of material and moral damage caused by acts of aggression against intellectual and cultural objects is not quantifiable.
图书馆屠杀:在20世纪,该政权赞助了对书籍和图书馆的破坏
这本书强调了二分法:洪水、地震、龙卷风等“自然”灾害对书籍的破坏,以及人为的破坏,如系统的掠夺、轰炸和焚烧。如果前者在大多数情况下无法避免,后者则涉及蓄意的暴力行为,是人类对人类文化的野蛮攻击。“Libricide”意味着屠杀。夏威夷大学马诺阿分校图书馆与信息科学项目副教授Rebecca Knuth选择这个词来指代“在二十世纪,大规模的、政权批准的对书籍和图书馆的破坏,旨在推进短期和长期意识形态驱动目标的有目的的行动”(第viii页)。作者将图书谋杀等同于种族灭绝和种族灭绝,并分析了在战争或内乱期间违反社会文化的背景下故意“杀害”图书的案件。图书馆之所以成为极端暴力的目标,是因为它们是国家文化认同的象征,是地方历史和集体记忆的宝库,代表着信仰体系,反映了一个社会在某个时间点的发展。极权主义政权将图书馆馆藏视为可以削弱或加强统治阶级或政党意识形态的工具。当图书馆被视为专制政府政治目标和使命的潜在敌人时,它们就会成为破坏、毁灭和掠夺的对象。高德纳认为审查制度是一种知识屠杀。通过来自世界各地的案例研究,讨论了政府支持的审查制度的使用,目的是消灭文化;从第二次世界大战期间的纳粹德国,希特勒政权“净化”了犹太文献的图书馆,并“洗劫、摧毁和捣毁”了德国占领地区的图书馆,作为建立一个同质化国家的精心设计战略的一部分,到中国文化大革命期间的毛主义中国,目的是大规模传播马克思主义文献,为大众灌输宣传服务。说明中国共产党在西藏对藏书犯下的暴行,以根除根深蒂固的传统文化;说明伊拉克人在第一次海湾战争期间占领科威特六个月期间对该国43%的藏书进行屠杀;说明塞族在波斯尼亚将波斯尼亚穆斯林、克罗地亚人和斯洛文尼亚人的文化遗产化为乌有;构成了Knuth弑图书馆理论框架发展的背景。在她看来,一个社会的发展、一种文化的发展都体现在图书馆的发展中,图书馆的消失就代表着一种文化的衰败。她不同意其他理论家的观点,他们认为湮灭是无循环过程的一部分,在这种过程中,衰落可能会引发智力重生和社会从灾难中复苏的增长阶段。毁坏图书馆藏书的长期影响会影响几代人。除了书籍、手稿、地图、照片和档案记录的实物流失之外,还有一种非物质的、更难以评估的后果,即对丢失文件中知识内容的获取受到限制,学者和广大公众无法从图书馆的书籍等公共物品中获取知识。人们无法给那些因蓄意破坏而消失的图书馆和档案藏品赋予真正的货币价值。对知识和文化对象的侵略行为所造成的物质和精神损害的程度是无法量化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信