Involving service users in the evaluation and redesign of primary care services for depression: A qualitative study

Penny Louch, C. Goodman, T. Greenhalgh
{"title":"Involving service users in the evaluation and redesign of primary care services for depression: A qualitative study","authors":"Penny Louch, C. Goodman, T. Greenhalgh","doi":"10.1185/135525706X56682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To understand the experiences, expectations and needs of service users with mild to moderate depression, and to use these to inform the design and redesign of local services in primary care. Design of study: Needs assessment using in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews. Setting: A single general practice in eastern England. Methods: Nine patients with depression were identified from the practice register using purposeful sampling and interviewed by a practice nurse who had not previously provided any care to them. Ritchie and Spencer's Framework approach was used to analyse the qualitative data. Results: Participants welcomed the opportunity to provide feedback on their experiences. They told many positive stories which affirmed the overall accessibility and acceptability of the existing service. They reported symptoms that were distressing and difficult to live with, even when their depression was classified by health professionals as 'mild'. Participants considered they had good access to care. Despite this, many participants identified gaps in the current service such as access to information and concerns about discontinuing medication in the future. Conclusion: In-depth interviews with patients with depression are a feasible and acceptable way of identifying service gaps and enabling users to contribute to service evaluation and redesign. © 2005 Librapharm Limited.","PeriodicalId":54586,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry","volume":"20 1","pages":"109-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1185/135525706X56682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim: To understand the experiences, expectations and needs of service users with mild to moderate depression, and to use these to inform the design and redesign of local services in primary care. Design of study: Needs assessment using in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews. Setting: A single general practice in eastern England. Methods: Nine patients with depression were identified from the practice register using purposeful sampling and interviewed by a practice nurse who had not previously provided any care to them. Ritchie and Spencer's Framework approach was used to analyse the qualitative data. Results: Participants welcomed the opportunity to provide feedback on their experiences. They told many positive stories which affirmed the overall accessibility and acceptability of the existing service. They reported symptoms that were distressing and difficult to live with, even when their depression was classified by health professionals as 'mild'. Participants considered they had good access to care. Despite this, many participants identified gaps in the current service such as access to information and concerns about discontinuing medication in the future. Conclusion: In-depth interviews with patients with depression are a feasible and acceptable way of identifying service gaps and enabling users to contribute to service evaluation and redesign. © 2005 Librapharm Limited.
让服务使用者参与抑郁症初级保健服务的评估与再设计:一项质性研究
目的:了解轻度至中度抑郁症服务使用者的经历、期望和需求,并以此为基础设计和重新设计地方初级保健服务提供信息。研究设计:使用深度半结构化定性访谈进行需求评估。背景:英格兰东部的一个普通诊所。方法:采用有目的的抽样方法从执业登记册中确定9例抑郁症患者,并由一名以前没有提供过任何护理的执业护士进行访谈。里奇和斯宾塞的框架方法被用于分析定性数据。结果:参与者对提供他们的经验反馈的机会表示欢迎。他们讲述了许多积极的故事,肯定了现有服务的总体可访问性和可接受性。他们报告的症状令人痛苦,难以忍受,即使他们的抑郁症被卫生专业人员归类为“轻度”。参与者认为他们可以很好地获得护理。尽管如此,许多与会者指出了目前服务中的差距,例如获取信息和对未来停药的担忧。结论:对抑郁症患者进行深度访谈是一种可行且可接受的方法,可以识别服务差距,使用户能够参与服务评估和重新设计。©2005 Librapharm Limited
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信