Bulimia nervosa mental health literacy of general practitioners.

P. Hay, C. D. Angelis, H. Millar, J. Mond
{"title":"Bulimia nervosa mental health literacy of general practitioners.","authors":"P. Hay, C. D. Angelis, H. Millar, J. Mond","doi":"10.1185/135525706X56673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The study's aims were to gain a better understanding of the bulimia nervosa mental health literacy (BN-MHL) of general practitioners (GPS), namely their beliefs about bulimia nervosa (BN) and its treatment, and to \ncompare these perceptions with those found in community women. \nMethods: A postal survey was sent to 304 city GPs. The survey comprised a fictional vignette of a woman with BN followed by questions about perceived prevalence, severity, management, aetiology and prognosis. \nResults: Of the 149 (49%) respondents, 95% identified the problem as an eating disorder, 51% specifying EN. Eighty percent considered it a very distressing problem and 70% considered it uncommon in their practice and very difficult \nto treat. Nearly half regarded a psychiatrist as the most helpful clinician. Eighty percent thought discrimination would occur if others knew about the problem. \nConclusion: GPs correctly identified BN and specialist treatment was favourably regarded. As found previously in surveys of the general population most GPs considered EN severe, distressing, and difficult to treat. The main \nlimitation of the study was the low response rate.","PeriodicalId":54586,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry","volume":"10 1","pages":"103-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1185/135525706X56673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Objectives: The study's aims were to gain a better understanding of the bulimia nervosa mental health literacy (BN-MHL) of general practitioners (GPS), namely their beliefs about bulimia nervosa (BN) and its treatment, and to compare these perceptions with those found in community women. Methods: A postal survey was sent to 304 city GPs. The survey comprised a fictional vignette of a woman with BN followed by questions about perceived prevalence, severity, management, aetiology and prognosis. Results: Of the 149 (49%) respondents, 95% identified the problem as an eating disorder, 51% specifying EN. Eighty percent considered it a very distressing problem and 70% considered it uncommon in their practice and very difficult to treat. Nearly half regarded a psychiatrist as the most helpful clinician. Eighty percent thought discrimination would occur if others knew about the problem. Conclusion: GPs correctly identified BN and specialist treatment was favourably regarded. As found previously in surveys of the general population most GPs considered EN severe, distressing, and difficult to treat. The main limitation of the study was the low response rate.
神经性贪食症全科医生的心理健康素养。
目的:本研究的目的是为了更好地了解全科医生(GPS)的神经性贪食心理健康素养(BN- mhl),即他们对神经性贪食(BN)及其治疗的看法,并将这些看法与社区妇女的看法进行比较。方法:对304名市属全科医生进行邮寄调查。该调查包括虚构的一名患有BN的妇女的小画像,随后是关于感知患病率、严重程度、管理、病因和预后的问题。结果:在149名(49%)受访者中,95%的人认为问题是饮食失调,51%的人认为是EN。80%的人认为这是一个非常痛苦的问题,70%的人认为这在他们的实践中很少见,很难治疗。将近一半的人认为精神科医生是最有帮助的临床医生。80%的人认为,如果其他人知道这个问题,就会发生歧视。结论:全科医生正确识别BN,专科治疗受到好评。正如以前在对一般人群的调查中发现的那样,大多数全科医生认为EN是严重的、令人痛苦的、难以治疗的。本研究的主要局限性是应答率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信