A systems-based framework to measure, predict, and manage fatigue

A. Lehrer
{"title":"A systems-based framework to measure, predict, and manage fatigue","authors":"A. Lehrer","doi":"10.1177/1557234X15575522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transportation operator fatigue is a pervasive cross-modal risk, still largely unmitigated, costly, and underreported. Effectively predicting fatigue risk can help stem this trend and improve transportation safety, performance, and well-being. Not surprisingly, there is growing interest in applying fatigue models to support and evaluate safety-critical initiatives, such as scheduling, accident investigation, and hours-of-service rule making and compliance. Yet there is limited empirical data about whether current fatigue models are used as intended, how effectively they predict fatigue, and how they might be improved. Though current models typically focus on two or three biological processes that impact fatigue, the literature presents many internal and external variables that influence fatigue, and current models largely neglect this more comprehensive suite of contributing factors needed to assess individual employee risk across variable work environments. The U.S. Department of Transportation Safety Council has recognized the need to assess the strengths and weaknesses of existing biomathematical fatigue models and to explore how to maximize efficacy, reliability, and validity. In this chapter, we review a sample of current fatigue models, identify performance gaps, and describe an overarching framework to guide next-generation fatigue model development. The proposed eight-state model offers a novel systems-based approach to integrate contributing internal and external fatigue factors and better measure, predict, and manage fatigue risk across transportation and other safety-critical operations. Keywords: Driver distraction; Language: en","PeriodicalId":90321,"journal":{"name":"Review of human factors and ergonomics","volume":"10 1","pages":"194-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1557234X15575522","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of human factors and ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1557234X15575522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Transportation operator fatigue is a pervasive cross-modal risk, still largely unmitigated, costly, and underreported. Effectively predicting fatigue risk can help stem this trend and improve transportation safety, performance, and well-being. Not surprisingly, there is growing interest in applying fatigue models to support and evaluate safety-critical initiatives, such as scheduling, accident investigation, and hours-of-service rule making and compliance. Yet there is limited empirical data about whether current fatigue models are used as intended, how effectively they predict fatigue, and how they might be improved. Though current models typically focus on two or three biological processes that impact fatigue, the literature presents many internal and external variables that influence fatigue, and current models largely neglect this more comprehensive suite of contributing factors needed to assess individual employee risk across variable work environments. The U.S. Department of Transportation Safety Council has recognized the need to assess the strengths and weaknesses of existing biomathematical fatigue models and to explore how to maximize efficacy, reliability, and validity. In this chapter, we review a sample of current fatigue models, identify performance gaps, and describe an overarching framework to guide next-generation fatigue model development. The proposed eight-state model offers a novel systems-based approach to integrate contributing internal and external fatigue factors and better measure, predict, and manage fatigue risk across transportation and other safety-critical operations. Keywords: Driver distraction; Language: en
一个基于系统的框架来测量、预测和管理疲劳
运输操作人员疲劳是一种普遍存在的跨模式风险,在很大程度上仍未得到缓解,成本高昂,且报告不足。有效预测疲劳风险有助于遏制这一趋势,提高运输安全、性能和福祉。毫不奇怪,人们对应用疲劳模型来支持和评估安全关键计划的兴趣越来越大,例如调度、事故调查和服务时间规则制定和遵从性。然而,关于目前的疲劳模型是否按预期使用,它们预测疲劳的有效性如何,以及如何改进这些模型的经验数据有限。虽然当前的模型通常关注影响疲劳的两三个生物过程,但文献提出了许多影响疲劳的内部和外部变量,并且当前的模型在很大程度上忽略了评估不同工作环境中个体员工风险所需的更全面的贡献因素套件。美国运输安全委员会已经认识到有必要评估现有生物数学疲劳模型的优缺点,并探索如何最大限度地提高有效性、可靠性和有效性。在本章中,我们回顾了当前疲劳模型的样本,确定了性能差距,并描述了指导下一代疲劳模型开发的总体框架。提出的八状态模型提供了一种基于系统的新方法,可以整合内部和外部疲劳因素,更好地测量、预测和管理运输和其他安全关键操作中的疲劳风险。关键词:驾驶员分心;语言:在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书