Editorial – Dr Coral Sirdifield and Charlie Brooker

IF 0.8 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
C. Brooker
{"title":"Editorial – Dr Coral Sirdifield and Charlie Brooker","authors":"C. Brooker","doi":"10.1177/20662203221146006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is timely that the publication of this special edition of the Journal coincides with the ongoing development of a Council of Europe White Paper on mental health in prisons and probation. The Council for Penological Co-operation (PC-CP), in accordance with its terms of reference for 2020–2021 (Doc. CM (2019) 131-addrev2), examined, in the course of 8 meetings in 2021 and 2022, the management of persons with mental health disorders by the prison and probation services, the challenges which might be faced by prison and probation staff in relation to this and what possible solutions and standards might need to be developed at European level. A questionnaire was sent to the prison and probation services of the Council of Europe member States to take stock of the situation and to inform the setting of key principles and recommendations. The survey established that there was a national policy for probation and mental health in just over half of the countries/jurisdictions (53%). This contrasted sharply with prisons where policy exists in nearly all countries/jurisdictions (93%). Clearly for probation, much remains to be done at a national level. A similar disparity was seen in relation to mental health awareness training with 74% of prison staff receiving some sort of training compared to only 37% of probation staff. It is worth noting that in 25 countries/ jurisdictions probation staff are not provided with any training on mental health issues. Estimates of the prevalence of mental health disorders varied significantly in prisons ranging from 0 to 80% (median = 18%) whilst in probation they ranged from 2 to 90% (median 15%). It is worth reiterating that all respondents were given the same WHO definition to use in their answers:","PeriodicalId":44523,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Probation","volume":"24 1","pages":"175 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Probation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203221146006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is timely that the publication of this special edition of the Journal coincides with the ongoing development of a Council of Europe White Paper on mental health in prisons and probation. The Council for Penological Co-operation (PC-CP), in accordance with its terms of reference for 2020–2021 (Doc. CM (2019) 131-addrev2), examined, in the course of 8 meetings in 2021 and 2022, the management of persons with mental health disorders by the prison and probation services, the challenges which might be faced by prison and probation staff in relation to this and what possible solutions and standards might need to be developed at European level. A questionnaire was sent to the prison and probation services of the Council of Europe member States to take stock of the situation and to inform the setting of key principles and recommendations. The survey established that there was a national policy for probation and mental health in just over half of the countries/jurisdictions (53%). This contrasted sharply with prisons where policy exists in nearly all countries/jurisdictions (93%). Clearly for probation, much remains to be done at a national level. A similar disparity was seen in relation to mental health awareness training with 74% of prison staff receiving some sort of training compared to only 37% of probation staff. It is worth noting that in 25 countries/ jurisdictions probation staff are not provided with any training on mental health issues. Estimates of the prevalence of mental health disorders varied significantly in prisons ranging from 0 to 80% (median = 18%) whilst in probation they ranged from 2 to 90% (median 15%). It is worth reiterating that all respondents were given the same WHO definition to use in their answers:
社论-科勒尔·西尔迪菲尔德博士和查理·布鲁克
《华尔街日报》这一特别版的出版恰逢欧洲委员会正在编制关于监狱和缓刑中的心理健康的白皮书。根据其2020-2021年的职权范围,国际刑事司法合作理事会(PC-CP)。CM (2019) 131-addrev2)在2021年和2022年的8次会议中审查了监狱和缓刑服务机构对精神健康障碍患者的管理,监狱和缓刑工作人员在这方面可能面临的挑战,以及可能需要在欧洲一级制定哪些可能的解决办法和标准。向欧洲委员会成员国的监狱和缓刑服务机构发出了一份调查表,以评估情况,并为制定关键原则和建议提供信息。调查确定,半数以上的国家/司法管辖区(53%)制定了缓刑和心理健康方面的国家政策。这与几乎所有国家/司法管辖区(93%)都有监狱政策形成鲜明对比。显然是为了试用,在国家一级还有许多工作要做。在心理健康意识培训方面也存在类似的差距,74%的监狱工作人员接受过某种培训,而只有37%的缓刑工作人员接受过这种培训。值得注意的是,在25个国家/司法管辖区,没有向缓刑工作人员提供任何关于心理健康问题的培训。在监狱中,对精神健康障碍患病率的估计差异很大,从0%到80%不等(中位数= 18%),而在缓刑期间,这一比例从2%到90%不等(中位数为15%)。值得重申的是,所有答复者都获得了世卫组织相同的定义,以便在其回答中使用:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Probation
European Journal of Probation CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信