Ambulance crew not negligent in choice of hospital: Stephen Lowe v Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (Sheffield County Court, 12 February 2016 – Recorder P W Miller)

J. Mead
{"title":"Ambulance crew not negligent in choice of hospital: Stephen Lowe v Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (Sheffield County Court, 12 February 2016 – Recorder P W Miller)","authors":"J. Mead","doi":"10.1177/1356262217703438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The claimant lived in Mexborough in Yorkshire. On 19 June 2009 at approximately 07:00, hewas in his kitchen at home when his wife noted that he was neither walking nor talking normally and was showing weakness on the right side. She promptly telephoned for an ambulance. One of the trust’s ambulances arrived at 07:14. It was staffed by two paramedics who examined Mr Lowe and agreed that he had probably suffered a stroke. By 07:20, therefore, they were aware that the patient was in urgent need of emergency medical treatment and that they had, without delay, to decide upon and telephone an alert to the most appropriate accident and emergency (A&E) department. There were only two possibilities: Rotherham District Hospital and Doncaster Royal Infirmary, each of which possessed an A&E department and stroke unit. The crew were very familiar with local traffic conditions and calculated that it would have taken them between 20 and 22min to reach Doncaster, whereas Rotherham could be reached in 5min less. They were also aware that in the event the patient required onward referral to the neurological department at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital in Sheffield, the further ambulance journey would take 10 to 11min from Rotherham but 25 to 26min from Doncaster. An important distinction between the stroke units at the two hospitals was that at certain times of the day Doncaster, but not Rotherham, offered thrombolysis. In 2009, this was a relatively new treatment involving the use of drugs to break down blood clots. However, the service was only available from 08:00 h until 20:00 h at Doncaster, and the ambulance staff knew that prior to 08:00 h, it was not possible to contact the relevant department by telephone. Furthermore, the Ambulance Service’s guidance in respect of the period 20:00 to 08:00 h was to ‘‘Manage the patient as their condition dictates, with a pre-alert to emergency department as per local protocol’’. In view of all the above considerations, the crew took Mr Lowe to Rotherham District Hospital.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"22 1","pages":"108 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262217703438","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262217703438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The claimant lived in Mexborough in Yorkshire. On 19 June 2009 at approximately 07:00, hewas in his kitchen at home when his wife noted that he was neither walking nor talking normally and was showing weakness on the right side. She promptly telephoned for an ambulance. One of the trust’s ambulances arrived at 07:14. It was staffed by two paramedics who examined Mr Lowe and agreed that he had probably suffered a stroke. By 07:20, therefore, they were aware that the patient was in urgent need of emergency medical treatment and that they had, without delay, to decide upon and telephone an alert to the most appropriate accident and emergency (A&E) department. There were only two possibilities: Rotherham District Hospital and Doncaster Royal Infirmary, each of which possessed an A&E department and stroke unit. The crew were very familiar with local traffic conditions and calculated that it would have taken them between 20 and 22min to reach Doncaster, whereas Rotherham could be reached in 5min less. They were also aware that in the event the patient required onward referral to the neurological department at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital in Sheffield, the further ambulance journey would take 10 to 11min from Rotherham but 25 to 26min from Doncaster. An important distinction between the stroke units at the two hospitals was that at certain times of the day Doncaster, but not Rotherham, offered thrombolysis. In 2009, this was a relatively new treatment involving the use of drugs to break down blood clots. However, the service was only available from 08:00 h until 20:00 h at Doncaster, and the ambulance staff knew that prior to 08:00 h, it was not possible to contact the relevant department by telephone. Furthermore, the Ambulance Service’s guidance in respect of the period 20:00 to 08:00 h was to ‘‘Manage the patient as their condition dictates, with a pre-alert to emergency department as per local protocol’’. In view of all the above considerations, the crew took Mr Lowe to Rotherham District Hospital.
救护人员在医院选择上没有过失:Stephen Lowe诉约克郡救护车服务NHS信托基金(2016年2月12日-谢菲尔德郡法院-记录员P W Miller)
索赔人住在约克郡的梅克斯伯勒。2009年6月19日大约07:00时,他正在家中的厨房里,他的妻子注意到他既不能正常行走也不能正常说话,而且右侧出现无力。她立即打电话叫了一辆救护车。信托的一辆救护车在07:14到达。两名医护人员对洛威进行了检查,认为他可能是中风。因此,到07:20,他们意识到病人迫切需要紧急医疗,他们必须毫不拖延地做出决定,并打电话向最合适的事故和紧急情况部门发出警报。只有两种可能:罗瑟勒姆地区医院和唐卡斯特皇家医院,这两家医院都有急症室和中风科。工作人员非常熟悉当地的交通状况,并计算出他们到达唐卡斯特需要20到22分钟,而到达罗瑟勒姆只需5分钟。他们还意识到,如果病人需要转到谢菲尔德皇家哈勒姆郡医院的神经内科,从罗瑟勒姆到唐卡斯特的救护车路程需要10到11分钟,而从唐卡斯特到罗瑟勒姆需要25到26分钟。这两家医院中风科室的一个重要区别是,在一天中的某些时间,唐卡斯特医院提供溶栓治疗,而罗瑟勒姆医院没有。在2009年,这是一种相对较新的治疗方法,涉及使用药物分解血凝块。然而,在唐卡斯特,这项服务只在08:00到20:00之间提供,救护车工作人员知道,在08:00之前,无法通过电话联系相关部门。此外,救护车服务处在20:00至08:00期间的指导方针是"根据病人的情况对其进行管理,并根据当地规程向急诊科发出预先警报"。鉴于上述种种考虑,船员们把洛威先生送到罗瑟勒姆地区医院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信