Trust hairdresser unable to recover for RSI – Lavinia Carrington -v- South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (Southend County Court, 4/6/2014 – Judge Moloney QC)

J. Mead
{"title":"Trust hairdresser unable to recover for RSI – Lavinia Carrington -v- South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (Southend County Court, 4/6/2014 – Judge Moloney QC)","authors":"J. Mead","doi":"10.1177/1356262214554741A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"up over time. This, in the view of the judge, was helpful. From the moment of the first telephone call the glass started filling and kept being ‘topped up’ until eventually it overflowed in April 2010 when Mr Harris went to see his GP. The evidence of Professor Longson was generally to be preferred to that of Dr Elves. Held: The evidence did not support Dr Elves’ view that the claimant’s injury was a result of one incident. There were a number of factors, including: initial worry following the first telephone call; frustration and not being able to get home more quickly; being told of the gravity of the situation at hospital; seeing Mrs Harris in the Intensive Care Unit; the effect generally on family life and in particular on his relationship with his wife; the feelings of guilt which he had to deal with; and anger felt towards the Trust. It was impossible to conclude that there had been one single shocking event. Accordingly, this claim did not fall within the criteria for recovery laid down in Alcock and would be dismissed. Wendy Owen (instructed by Graystons) appeared for the claimant. Yaqub Rahman (instructed by Hill Dickinson) appeared for the Trust.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"20 1","pages":"91 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262214554741A","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262214554741A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

up over time. This, in the view of the judge, was helpful. From the moment of the first telephone call the glass started filling and kept being ‘topped up’ until eventually it overflowed in April 2010 when Mr Harris went to see his GP. The evidence of Professor Longson was generally to be preferred to that of Dr Elves. Held: The evidence did not support Dr Elves’ view that the claimant’s injury was a result of one incident. There were a number of factors, including: initial worry following the first telephone call; frustration and not being able to get home more quickly; being told of the gravity of the situation at hospital; seeing Mrs Harris in the Intensive Care Unit; the effect generally on family life and in particular on his relationship with his wife; the feelings of guilt which he had to deal with; and anger felt towards the Trust. It was impossible to conclude that there had been one single shocking event. Accordingly, this claim did not fall within the criteria for recovery laid down in Alcock and would be dismissed. Wendy Owen (instructed by Graystons) appeared for the claimant. Yaqub Rahman (instructed by Hill Dickinson) appeared for the Trust.
信托发型师无法追回RSI - Lavinia Carrington -v- South Essex Partnership - NHS Foundation Trust (Southend County Court, 2014年6月4日-法官Moloney QC)
随着时间的推移。在法官看来,这很有帮助。从接到第一个电话的那一刻起,杯子就开始装满,一直“加满”,直到2010年4月哈里斯去看全科医生时,杯子终于满了。朗森教授的证据通常比埃尔夫斯博士的证据更可取。持有:证据不支持埃尔斯博士的观点,即索赔人的伤害是一次事故的结果。有很多因素,包括:第一次打电话后的最初担忧;沮丧和不能更快地回家;被告知医院情况的严重性;在加护病房看到哈里斯太太;对家庭生活的影响,尤其是对他与妻子关系的影响;他必须处理的罪恶感;对信托基金感到愤怒。不能断定只发生过一次令人震惊的事件。因此,这项索赔不属于阿尔科克案规定的赔偿标准,应予驳回。温蒂·欧文(受格雷斯顿指示)为原告出庭。雅库布·拉赫曼(由希尔·迪金森指示)代表信托基金出场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信