A duty of candour: A change in approach

C. Mellor
{"title":"A duty of candour: A change in approach","authors":"C. Mellor","doi":"10.1177/1356262213519982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article (written in April 2013) considers the observations and recommendations made in the Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry as to a duty of candour and, in particular, the recommendation that there should be a statutory duty of candour imposed on healthcare providers, as well as on registered medical practitioners, nurses and other registered professionals, who believe or suspect that patient treatment or care has caused death or serious injury. The article details the Government's initial response to such recommendations, in which it indicated an intention to introduce a statutory duty for health and care providers, and sets out the contractual duty of candour that is currently included in the NHS Standard Contract for 2013/14 (SC35). There is then an analysis of the terms of the contractual duty contrasted with those of the proposed statutory duty; a look at the limitations of the contractual duty; a discussion of some of the issues that may arise in relation to when the relevant duty (either contractual or statutory) will be triggered; a consideration of the apparent novelty of a statutory duty of candour in English law; and a brief discussion in relation to the potential remedies, penalties and offences that may be adopted if such a statutory duty comes into force. In conclusion, on any basis the imposition of the contractual duty of candour and the intention to introduce some form of statutory duty heralds a new era in relation to candour in healthcare.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"20 1","pages":"36 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262213519982","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262213519982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article (written in April 2013) considers the observations and recommendations made in the Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry as to a duty of candour and, in particular, the recommendation that there should be a statutory duty of candour imposed on healthcare providers, as well as on registered medical practitioners, nurses and other registered professionals, who believe or suspect that patient treatment or care has caused death or serious injury. The article details the Government's initial response to such recommendations, in which it indicated an intention to introduce a statutory duty for health and care providers, and sets out the contractual duty of candour that is currently included in the NHS Standard Contract for 2013/14 (SC35). There is then an analysis of the terms of the contractual duty contrasted with those of the proposed statutory duty; a look at the limitations of the contractual duty; a discussion of some of the issues that may arise in relation to when the relevant duty (either contractual or statutory) will be triggered; a consideration of the apparent novelty of a statutory duty of candour in English law; and a brief discussion in relation to the potential remedies, penalties and offences that may be adopted if such a statutory duty comes into force. In conclusion, on any basis the imposition of the contractual duty of candour and the intention to introduce some form of statutory duty heralds a new era in relation to candour in healthcare.
坦率的责任:方法上的改变
本文(写于2013年4月)考虑了《中斯塔福德郡国民保健服务基金会信托公众调查报告》中提出的关于坦率义务的意见和建议,特别是关于对相信或怀疑病人的治疗或护理已造成死亡或严重伤害的医疗保健提供者以及注册医生、护士和其他注册专业人员应规定法定坦率义务的建议。该条详细说明了政府对这些建议的初步答复,其中表示打算为保健和护理提供者规定法定义务,并列出了目前列入2013/14年国民保健服务标准合同(SC35)的合同义务。然后,将合同义务的条款与拟议的法定义务的条款进行对比分析;看一下合同义务的限制;讨论在何时触发相关责任(合同或法定)时可能出现的一些问题;对英国法律中法定诚实义务的新颖性的考虑;并简要讨论如果这种法定义务生效,可能采取的补救措施、处罚和违法行为。总之,在任何基础上,合同规定的坦诚义务和引入某种形式的法定义务的意图都预示着医疗领域坦诚的新时代的到来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信