Estrogen and the brain: does estrogen treatment improve cognitive function?

E. Hogervorst
{"title":"Estrogen and the brain: does estrogen treatment improve cognitive function?","authors":"E. Hogervorst","doi":"10.1177/1754045312473873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we describe potential reasons for the discrepancies between data from basic sciences and observational studies and those of large treatment studies investigating the association between brain function and sex steroids. Observational studies which often showed positive associations between hormone use and cognition can be affected by ‘recall bias’ and ‘healthy user bias’, while outcomes of treatment studies were hypothesized to be modified by age at treatment, age at or type of menopause, health status, addition of a progestogen or type of estrogen treatment. However, meta-analyses of data from treatment studies negate many of these hypotheses showing at best mainly short-term (up to 6 months) positive effects of estrogen treatment on cognition regardless of age. This positive effect may reverse, particularly in older women with prolonged hormone treatment, which was predominantly seen after addition of progestogen. Medroxyprogesterone acetate seemed to have worse effects on cognition than other types of progestogen in these long-term studies. Estradiol with or without a progestogen was three times more likely to have positive effects on cognition than conjugated equine estrogens. However, two-thirds of studies showed no associations at all which may be an underestimate given the possibility of publication bias. We briefly review alternative treatments, such as testosterone and soy-derived supplements, but currently insufficient data are available for conclusive comments. Women who have undergone surgical menopause or who undergo natural menopause before age 47 may benefit most from hormone treatment and a special case may need to be made for this group. Long-term safety studies for this group are urgently needed.","PeriodicalId":85745,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the British Menopause Society","volume":"19 1","pages":"19 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1754045312473873","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the British Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1754045312473873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In this paper we describe potential reasons for the discrepancies between data from basic sciences and observational studies and those of large treatment studies investigating the association between brain function and sex steroids. Observational studies which often showed positive associations between hormone use and cognition can be affected by ‘recall bias’ and ‘healthy user bias’, while outcomes of treatment studies were hypothesized to be modified by age at treatment, age at or type of menopause, health status, addition of a progestogen or type of estrogen treatment. However, meta-analyses of data from treatment studies negate many of these hypotheses showing at best mainly short-term (up to 6 months) positive effects of estrogen treatment on cognition regardless of age. This positive effect may reverse, particularly in older women with prolonged hormone treatment, which was predominantly seen after addition of progestogen. Medroxyprogesterone acetate seemed to have worse effects on cognition than other types of progestogen in these long-term studies. Estradiol with or without a progestogen was three times more likely to have positive effects on cognition than conjugated equine estrogens. However, two-thirds of studies showed no associations at all which may be an underestimate given the possibility of publication bias. We briefly review alternative treatments, such as testosterone and soy-derived supplements, but currently insufficient data are available for conclusive comments. Women who have undergone surgical menopause or who undergo natural menopause before age 47 may benefit most from hormone treatment and a special case may need to be made for this group. Long-term safety studies for this group are urgently needed.
雌激素与大脑:雌激素治疗能改善认知功能吗?
在本文中,我们描述了基础科学和观察性研究数据与调查脑功能和性类固醇之间关系的大型治疗研究数据之间差异的潜在原因。观察性研究往往显示激素使用与认知之间存在正相关,但可能受到"回忆偏差"和"健康使用者偏差"的影响,而治疗性研究的结果被假设受到治疗年龄、绝经年龄或绝经类型、健康状况、添加孕激素或雌激素治疗类型的影响。然而,对治疗研究数据的荟萃分析否定了这些假设中的许多假设,这些假设显示,雌激素治疗对认知的积极影响最多是短期的(最多6个月),而与年龄无关。这种积极作用可能会逆转,特别是在长期激素治疗的老年妇女中,这主要是在添加孕激素后出现的。在这些长期研究中,醋酸甲孕酮对认知的影响似乎比其他类型的黄体酮更差。有或没有孕激素的雌二醇对认知产生积极影响的可能性是结合马雌激素的三倍。然而,三分之二的研究显示根本没有关联,考虑到发表偏倚的可能性,这可能被低估了。我们简要回顾了替代疗法,如睾酮和大豆来源的补充剂,但目前没有足够的数据可供结论性评论。在47岁之前经历手术绝经或自然绝经的妇女可能从激素治疗中获益最多,这一群体可能需要特殊情况。迫切需要对这一群体进行长期安全性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信