Can the National Health Policy 2017 Strengthen the National Health System and Improve the Health of the Indian Populace?

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
R. Dehury, Janmejaya Samal, A. Raza, Shawnn Cautinho, M. Behera, P. Dehury
{"title":"Can the National Health Policy 2017 Strengthen the National Health System and Improve the Health of the Indian Populace?","authors":"R. Dehury, Janmejaya Samal, A. Raza, Shawnn Cautinho, M. Behera, P. Dehury","doi":"10.1177/09720634231175748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The union cabinet approved the National Health Policy (NHP) 2017 on 15 March 2017. After its initial draft stage, seeking opinions from different stakeholders for nearly 34 months, the NHP 2017 came to the public domain with its final version. The main objective of this version of the NHP is to implement the proposed National Health Assurance Plan, which has been one of the agendas of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government for the healthcare of the people. The main objective of this article is to critically appraise and discuss the scopes and limitations in accomplishing the targets set in the policy document. A critique of the targets has also been discussed, considering the historical evidence and experiences of achieving the same. In the end, suggestions and recommendations have also been suggested for improving the health system regarding NHP 2017. The article critically analyses NHP 2017 based on secondary and grey literature. Evidence from secondary literature has been juxtaposed to compare and contrast the difficulty in implementing the policy. Literature is obtained from electronically accessible search and indexing portals, such as Google, Google Scholar, Web of Sciences, Embase, PubMed, and PubMed Central by using the keywords like health policy, impact of health policy, human resources in health, health care information technology, hospitals, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, health insurance and public health. Considering the implementation challenges of the previous two NHPs, the current NHP 2017 should be relevant to the grassroots level nuances and should address not only the healthcare needs but also the human development indicators.","PeriodicalId":45421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Management","volume":"25 1","pages":"232 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634231175748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The union cabinet approved the National Health Policy (NHP) 2017 on 15 March 2017. After its initial draft stage, seeking opinions from different stakeholders for nearly 34 months, the NHP 2017 came to the public domain with its final version. The main objective of this version of the NHP is to implement the proposed National Health Assurance Plan, which has been one of the agendas of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government for the healthcare of the people. The main objective of this article is to critically appraise and discuss the scopes and limitations in accomplishing the targets set in the policy document. A critique of the targets has also been discussed, considering the historical evidence and experiences of achieving the same. In the end, suggestions and recommendations have also been suggested for improving the health system regarding NHP 2017. The article critically analyses NHP 2017 based on secondary and grey literature. Evidence from secondary literature has been juxtaposed to compare and contrast the difficulty in implementing the policy. Literature is obtained from electronically accessible search and indexing portals, such as Google, Google Scholar, Web of Sciences, Embase, PubMed, and PubMed Central by using the keywords like health policy, impact of health policy, human resources in health, health care information technology, hospitals, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, health insurance and public health. Considering the implementation challenges of the previous two NHPs, the current NHP 2017 should be relevant to the grassroots level nuances and should address not only the healthcare needs but also the human development indicators.
2017年国家卫生政策能否加强国家卫生系统并改善印度民众的健康状况?
联盟内阁于2017年3月15日批准了2017年国家卫生政策。在征求不同利益相关者意见近34个月的初步草案阶段之后,NHP 2017以其最终版本进入公共领域。这一版《国家卫生计划》的主要目标是实施拟议的《国家卫生保障计划》,该计划一直是全国民主联盟政府关于人民保健的议程之一。本文的主要目的是批判性地评估和讨论实现政策文件中设定的目标的范围和限制。考虑到实现这些目标的历史证据和经验,还讨论了对这些目标的批评。最后,针对2017年NHP提出了改进卫生系统的建议和建议。本文基于二手文献和灰色文献对NHP 2017进行批判性分析。从二手文献的证据已并列比较和对比的困难,在执行的政策。通过使用卫生政策、卫生政策影响、卫生人力资源、卫生保健信息技术、医院、药品和医疗设备、健康保险和公共卫生等关键字,从谷歌、谷歌Scholar、Web of Sciences、Embase、PubMed和PubMed Central等电子检索和索引门户网站获取文献。考虑到前两个国家卫生计划的实施挑战,当前的国家卫生计划2017应该与基层的细微差别相关,不仅应该解决卫生保健需求,而且应该解决人类发展指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Management
Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信