Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers.

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastrointestinal Tumors Pub Date : 2023-08-03 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000531536
Adel Shahnam, Udit Nindra, Nicholas McNamee, Robert Yoon, Ray Asghari, Weng Ng, Deme Karikios, Mark Wong
{"title":"Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers.","authors":"Adel Shahnam,&nbsp;Udit Nindra,&nbsp;Nicholas McNamee,&nbsp;Robert Yoon,&nbsp;Ray Asghari,&nbsp;Weng Ng,&nbsp;Deme Karikios,&nbsp;Mark Wong","doi":"10.1159/000531536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment of oesophageal (OC), gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), and gastric cancer (GC) includes either neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) for OC or GOJ or perioperative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for OC, GOJ, and GC adenocarcinomas. This study aims to describe the real-world outcomes of patients with GC, GOJ, and OC treated with FLOT or CROSS and identify variables associated with efficacy through exploratory analysis. We also aimed to evaluate the comparison of FLOT and CROSS for the treatment of OC and GOJ adenocarcinomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study of patients with locally advanced OC, GOJ, or GC treated with FLOT or CROSS between January 2015 and June 2021 in 5 cancer centres across Sydney, Australia. Long-rank test was used to compare survival estimated between subgroups. Hazard ratios for univariate and multivariate analyses were estimated with Cox proportional regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 168 patients. The 24-month relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for FLOT were 59% and 69%, respectively. The median RFS was 29.6 months and median OS was not reached. For CROSS, the 24-month RFS and OS were 55% and 63% with a median RFS and OS of 28.5 and 40.2 months, respectively. There was no difference in OS and RFS between the treatments. FLOT was less tolerable than CROSS with more dose reductions, treatment discontinuation, and clinically relevant grade 3 and 4 toxicity. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio was associated with survival for both treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Similar efficacy outcomes were seen in this real-world population compared to the clinical trials for FLOT and CROSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"1 1","pages":"19-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of oesophageal (OC), gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), and gastric cancer (GC) includes either neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) for OC or GOJ or perioperative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for OC, GOJ, and GC adenocarcinomas. This study aims to describe the real-world outcomes of patients with GC, GOJ, and OC treated with FLOT or CROSS and identify variables associated with efficacy through exploratory analysis. We also aimed to evaluate the comparison of FLOT and CROSS for the treatment of OC and GOJ adenocarcinomas.

Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of patients with locally advanced OC, GOJ, or GC treated with FLOT or CROSS between January 2015 and June 2021 in 5 cancer centres across Sydney, Australia. Long-rank test was used to compare survival estimated between subgroups. Hazard ratios for univariate and multivariate analyses were estimated with Cox proportional regression.

Results: The study included 168 patients. The 24-month relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for FLOT were 59% and 69%, respectively. The median RFS was 29.6 months and median OS was not reached. For CROSS, the 24-month RFS and OS were 55% and 63% with a median RFS and OS of 28.5 and 40.2 months, respectively. There was no difference in OS and RFS between the treatments. FLOT was less tolerable than CROSS with more dose reductions, treatment discontinuation, and clinically relevant grade 3 and 4 toxicity. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio was associated with survival for both treatments.

Conclusion: Similar efficacy outcomes were seen in this real-world population compared to the clinical trials for FLOT and CROSS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

FLOT与CROSS方案对食管癌患者的真实结果。
简介:食管癌(OC)、胃-食管交界处癌(GOJ)和癌症(GC)的治疗包括对癌症进行新辅助化疗,然后对OC或GOJ进行手术研究(CROSS),或对OC、GOJ和GC腺癌进行围术期5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸、奥沙利铂和多烯紫杉醇(FLOT)。本研究旨在描述接受FLOT或CROSS治疗的GC、GOJ和OC患者的真实世界结果,并通过探索性分析确定与疗效相关的变量。我们还旨在评估FLOT和CROSS治疗OC和GOJ腺癌的比较。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,研究对象为2015年1月至2021年6月期间在澳大利亚悉尼5个癌症中心接受FLOT或CROSS治疗的局部晚期OC、GOJ或GC患者。使用长秩检验来比较亚组之间估计的生存率。单变量和多变量分析的危险比用Cox比例回归估计。结果:该研究包括168名患者。FLOT的24个月无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为59%和69%。RFS中位数为29.6个月,OS中位数未达到。对于CROSS,24个月的RFS和OS分别为55%和63%,中位数RFS和OS分别为28.5和40.2个月。两种处理之间OS和RFS没有差异。FLOT的耐受性低于CROSS,有更多的剂量减少、停药和临床相关的3级和4级毒性。中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率与两种治疗的存活率相关。结论:与FLOT和CROSS的临床试验相比,在这个真实世界的人群中看到了类似的疗效结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal Tumors
Gastrointestinal Tumors GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信