Utility of Intravenous β-Blocker Administration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Intervention

A. Halkin, G. Stone
{"title":"Utility of Intravenous β-Blocker Administration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Intervention","authors":"A. Halkin, G. Stone","doi":"10.1159/000085891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clinical effects of intravenous β-adrenoreceptor- blocking agents (β-blockers) administered during evolving acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have varied among published studies, depending on whether or not reperfusion therapy was employed. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is accepted as the superior form of reperfusion therapy for AMI if it can be performed by an experienced team in a timely fashion. Intravenous β-blockers are not routinely used in this setting and their role as adjunctive medical therapy to catheter-based reperfusion requires definition. Emerging data strongly indicate that in the absence of cardiogenic shock or specific contra-indications, pre-procedural intravenous β-blockade improves survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary PCI, and that these effects are modulated by oral β-blocker use at the time of AMI onset. In the absence of contra-indications, the available evidence supports the routine administration of intravenous β-blockers to patients with ST-segment elevation AMI managed by catheter-based reperfusion therapy, especially in patients in whom oral β-blockers were not used before admission. While no data are available on the effects of intravenous β-blocker therapy with catheter-based intervention for acute coronary syndromes other than ST-segment elevation AMI, it is reasonable to apply the aforementioned recommendations regarding primary PCI to these patients as well.","PeriodicalId":87985,"journal":{"name":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","volume":"5 1","pages":"168 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000085891","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000085891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical effects of intravenous β-adrenoreceptor- blocking agents (β-blockers) administered during evolving acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have varied among published studies, depending on whether or not reperfusion therapy was employed. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is accepted as the superior form of reperfusion therapy for AMI if it can be performed by an experienced team in a timely fashion. Intravenous β-blockers are not routinely used in this setting and their role as adjunctive medical therapy to catheter-based reperfusion requires definition. Emerging data strongly indicate that in the absence of cardiogenic shock or specific contra-indications, pre-procedural intravenous β-blockade improves survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary PCI, and that these effects are modulated by oral β-blocker use at the time of AMI onset. In the absence of contra-indications, the available evidence supports the routine administration of intravenous β-blockers to patients with ST-segment elevation AMI managed by catheter-based reperfusion therapy, especially in patients in whom oral β-blockers were not used before admission. While no data are available on the effects of intravenous β-blocker therapy with catheter-based intervention for acute coronary syndromes other than ST-segment elevation AMI, it is reasonable to apply the aforementioned recommendations regarding primary PCI to these patients as well.
静脉注射β受体阻滞剂在急性心肌梗死患者经皮介入治疗中的应用
在发展中的急性心肌梗死(AMI)期间静脉注射β-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂(β-受体阻滞剂)的临床效果在已发表的研究中有所不同,这取决于是否采用再灌注治疗。初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)被认为是AMI再灌注治疗的最佳形式,如果它能由经验丰富的团队及时实施。静脉注射β受体阻滞剂在这种情况下没有常规使用,它们作为导管再灌注辅助药物治疗的作用需要明确。新出现的数据有力地表明,在没有心源性休克或特定禁忌症的情况下,术前静脉注射β阻断剂可改善初次PCI术后左心室功能的生存和恢复,并且这些作用可通过AMI发病时口服β阻断剂进行调节。在无禁忌症的情况下,现有证据支持对经导管再灌注治疗的st段抬高AMI患者常规静脉注射β受体阻滞剂,特别是入院前未使用口服β受体阻滞剂的患者。虽然目前还没有关于静脉注射β受体阻滞剂联合导管介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(st段抬高型AMI除外)的效果的数据,但对于这些患者,也可以采用上述关于初次PCI的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信