Family Enterprises and Business Partnerships: Rural Entrepreneurs in India, Malaysia, and Indonesia

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
M. Rutten
{"title":"Family Enterprises and Business Partnerships: Rural Entrepreneurs in India, Malaysia, and Indonesia","authors":"M. Rutten","doi":"10.1177/097135570101000203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An overview of the major debates on entrepreneurship in South and Southeast Asia indi cates an emphasis on collective forms of business organisation. While earlier views argued that collectivism in business activities was one of the main causes of Asia's backwardness, more recent notions emphasise that family enterprises and business net works account for Asia's economic rise. This article compares the forms of business organisation of rural entrepreneurs in India, Malaysia and Indonesia. It is based on empirical research among Hindu small-scale industrialists in central Gujarat, Chinese and Malay owners of combine harvesters in the Muda region, and Muslim owners of iron foundries in Central Java. These findings indicate that both collective and indi vidual strategies are present within each group. It is the flexibility of the business organ isation to adjust to changing social and economic circumstances that explains the success or failure of any enterprise. These findings are in line with studies on European entrepreneurs. There is therefore reason to reconsider the notion of significant differ ences in business organisation between Asian and European entrepreneurs.","PeriodicalId":45394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entrepreneurship","volume":"10 1","pages":"165 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/097135570101000203","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/097135570101000203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

An overview of the major debates on entrepreneurship in South and Southeast Asia indi cates an emphasis on collective forms of business organisation. While earlier views argued that collectivism in business activities was one of the main causes of Asia's backwardness, more recent notions emphasise that family enterprises and business net works account for Asia's economic rise. This article compares the forms of business organisation of rural entrepreneurs in India, Malaysia and Indonesia. It is based on empirical research among Hindu small-scale industrialists in central Gujarat, Chinese and Malay owners of combine harvesters in the Muda region, and Muslim owners of iron foundries in Central Java. These findings indicate that both collective and indi vidual strategies are present within each group. It is the flexibility of the business organ isation to adjust to changing social and economic circumstances that explains the success or failure of any enterprise. These findings are in line with studies on European entrepreneurs. There is therefore reason to reconsider the notion of significant differ ences in business organisation between Asian and European entrepreneurs.
家族企业与商业伙伴关系:印度、马来西亚和印度尼西亚的农村企业家
对南亚和东南亚关于企业家精神的主要辩论的概述表明,强调集体形式的商业组织。虽然早期的观点认为,商业活动中的集体主义是亚洲落后的主要原因之一,但最近的观点强调,家族企业和商业网络是亚洲经济崛起的原因。本文比较了印度、马来西亚和印度尼西亚农村企业家的商业组织形式。该报告基于对古吉拉特邦中部的印度教小型工业家、穆达地区联合收割机的华人和马来人所有者,以及中爪哇铁铸造厂的穆斯林所有者的实证研究。这些发现表明,集体和个人策略都存在于每个群体中。这是商业机构适应不断变化的社会和经济环境的灵活性,解释了任何企业的成功或失败。这些发现与对欧洲企业家的研究一致。因此,有理由重新考虑亚洲和欧洲企业家在商业组织方面存在重大差异的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Entrepreneurship is a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and research and discussion of issues that bear upon and enfold the field of entrepreneurship. Topics appropriate and related to entrepreneurship include intrapreneurship, managership, organisational behaviour, leadership, motivation, training and ethical/ moral notions guiding entrepreneurial behaviour. Disciplinary boundaries that straddle entrepreneurship theory and research include economics, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, management and others. The journal particularly welcomes articles that advance our understanding of entrepreneurship phenomenon across different national and cultural contexts. Articles should be well articulated and substantive. The journal is peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信