Lick the Stomach and Bite the Heart?

V. Prabhakar
{"title":"Lick the Stomach and Bite the Heart?","authors":"V. Prabhakar","doi":"10.1159/000083666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tomatic ulcers for celecoxib versus NSAIDs were 2.01 versus 2.12% (p = 0.92) and 4.70 versus 6.00% (p = 0.49) [3] . The TARGET study (Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial) claimed that the risk of cardiovascular events was comparable among lumiracoxib, naproxen and ibuprofen. Patients in TARGET were 50 years old or older, but the study excluded patients with myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery bypass surgery, or congestive heart failure [4] . Less than 2% of the patients had a previous myocardial infarction or a revascularization procedure. Unfortunately, this trial, like all others in the clinical development of coxibs, did not refl ect the general population but excluded patients with known preexisting coronary artery disease. In practice, osteoarthritis frequently coexists with coronary artery disease. The reduction in the protective effect of aspirin on coronary events when coadministered with coxibs has also not been suffi ciently analyzed. In the case of patients taking low-dose aspirin, it is unnecessary to add coxibs; there is no benefi t in the reduction of ulcer complications. Moreover, questions regarding the risk of myocardial infarction remain unanswered despite polypharmacy. The review by Otterstad [1] addresses a well-known controversy about Cox-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk, but leaves clinical questions unanswered in the light of the Vioxx withdrawal. The main reason why clinicians choose Cox-2 inhibitors is because of their relatively lesser side effects on the gastric mucosa. In osteoarthritis patients with a risk of cardiovascular events, low-dose aspirin is advised by some clinicians along with Cox-2 inhibitors like celecoxib and lumiracoxib. This combination effectively nullifi es the benefi t of Cox-2 inhibitors on the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Low-dose aspirin also carries a risk of GI bleed [2] . The question is how many of us would use two NSAIDs for two different indications or use one NSAID for two different indications? It would be more benefi cial if these patients were prescribed aspirin at doses of 1,000 mg per day in combination with proton pump inhibitors to confer protection against cardiovascular events and GI symptoms in addition to pain relief in osteoarthritis. In the CLASS study (Celecoxib Longterm Arthritis Safety Study), for patients taking aspirin with celecoxib, the annualized incidence rates of upper GI ulcer complications alone and combined with sympPublished online: January 27, 2005","PeriodicalId":87985,"journal":{"name":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","volume":"5 1","pages":"100 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000083666","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000083666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

tomatic ulcers for celecoxib versus NSAIDs were 2.01 versus 2.12% (p = 0.92) and 4.70 versus 6.00% (p = 0.49) [3] . The TARGET study (Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial) claimed that the risk of cardiovascular events was comparable among lumiracoxib, naproxen and ibuprofen. Patients in TARGET were 50 years old or older, but the study excluded patients with myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery bypass surgery, or congestive heart failure [4] . Less than 2% of the patients had a previous myocardial infarction or a revascularization procedure. Unfortunately, this trial, like all others in the clinical development of coxibs, did not refl ect the general population but excluded patients with known preexisting coronary artery disease. In practice, osteoarthritis frequently coexists with coronary artery disease. The reduction in the protective effect of aspirin on coronary events when coadministered with coxibs has also not been suffi ciently analyzed. In the case of patients taking low-dose aspirin, it is unnecessary to add coxibs; there is no benefi t in the reduction of ulcer complications. Moreover, questions regarding the risk of myocardial infarction remain unanswered despite polypharmacy. The review by Otterstad [1] addresses a well-known controversy about Cox-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk, but leaves clinical questions unanswered in the light of the Vioxx withdrawal. The main reason why clinicians choose Cox-2 inhibitors is because of their relatively lesser side effects on the gastric mucosa. In osteoarthritis patients with a risk of cardiovascular events, low-dose aspirin is advised by some clinicians along with Cox-2 inhibitors like celecoxib and lumiracoxib. This combination effectively nullifi es the benefi t of Cox-2 inhibitors on the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Low-dose aspirin also carries a risk of GI bleed [2] . The question is how many of us would use two NSAIDs for two different indications or use one NSAID for two different indications? It would be more benefi cial if these patients were prescribed aspirin at doses of 1,000 mg per day in combination with proton pump inhibitors to confer protection against cardiovascular events and GI symptoms in addition to pain relief in osteoarthritis. In the CLASS study (Celecoxib Longterm Arthritis Safety Study), for patients taking aspirin with celecoxib, the annualized incidence rates of upper GI ulcer complications alone and combined with sympPublished online: January 27, 2005
舔胃咬心?
塞来昔布和非甾体抗炎药的自动溃疡分别为2.01和2.12% (p = 0.92)和4.70和6.00% (p = 0.49)。TARGET研究(治疗性关节炎研究和胃肠道事件试验)声称,鲁米拉昔布、萘普生和布洛芬的心血管事件风险相当。TARGET研究的患者年龄在50岁或以上,但该研究排除了心肌梗死、中风、冠状动脉搭桥手术或充血性心力衰竭患者。不到2%的患者既往有心肌梗死或行过血运重建术。不幸的是,这项试验,像所有其他临床开发的coxibs一样,没有反映一般人群,而是排除了已知既往存在冠状动脉疾病的患者。在实践中,骨关节炎经常与冠状动脉疾病共存。阿司匹林与coxibs合用时对冠状动脉事件保护作用的降低也没有得到充分的分析。在患者服用低剂量阿司匹林的情况下,不需要添加coxib;在减少溃疡并发症方面没有任何益处。此外,尽管多药治疗,关于心肌梗死风险的问题仍未得到解答。Otterstad[1]的综述解决了关于Cox-2抑制剂和心血管风险的一个众所周知的争议,但鉴于Vioxx的停药,没有回答临床问题。临床医生选择Cox-2抑制剂的主要原因是其对胃粘膜的副作用相对较小。对于有心血管事件风险的骨关节炎患者,一些临床医生建议低剂量阿司匹林与Cox-2抑制剂如塞来昔布和鲁米拉昔布一起使用。这种组合有效地抵消了Cox-2抑制剂对胃肠道(GI)系统的益处。低剂量阿司匹林也有消化道出血的风险。问题是我们中有多少人会针对两种不同的适应症使用两种非甾体抗炎药或者针对两种不同的适应症使用一种非甾体抗炎药?如果这些患者每天服用剂量为1000毫克的阿司匹林,并联合质子泵抑制剂,除了缓解骨关节炎的疼痛外,还能预防心血管事件和胃肠道症状,这将更有益。在CLASS研究(塞来昔布长期关节炎安全性研究)中,对于服用阿司匹林和塞来昔布的患者,单独和合并上消化道溃疡并发症的年化发病率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信