Status Risk Taking and Receptivity of Home Economics Teachers to a Statewide Curriculum Innovation

Ellen H. Katz, Sharron Dalton, Joseph B. Giacquinta
{"title":"Status Risk Taking and Receptivity of Home Economics Teachers to a Statewide Curriculum Innovation","authors":"Ellen H. Katz,&nbsp;Sharron Dalton,&nbsp;Joseph B. Giacquinta","doi":"10.1177/0046777494224003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current receptivity of seventh-and eighth-grade home economics teachers and supervisors in New York State to the four modules of the Home and Career Skills curriculum was investigated in relation to level of curriculum implementation and to perceived risks and/or benefits to status perquisites. Giacquinta's (1975a) status-risk theory of receptivity provides the theoretical framework for data analysis. Usable responses represented 82% (n = 280) of the population surveyed. The study found that both teachers and supervisors were highly receptive to the four modules of the Home and Career Skills curriculum and that there was a high level of implementation of the four curriculum modules. Receptivity was also shown to be related to the teachers' and supervisors' perception of status perquisite benefits. The major benefits perceived were self-esteem or competence, increased in-service education (training), availability of resources, confidence as an educator, and job security. The authors find that the status-risk theory of receptivity is an example of theories that could contribute to a better understanding of curriculum change in home economics and should be used in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":100610,"journal":{"name":"Home Economics Research Journal","volume":"22 4","pages":"401-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0046777494224003","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Economics Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1177/0046777494224003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Current receptivity of seventh-and eighth-grade home economics teachers and supervisors in New York State to the four modules of the Home and Career Skills curriculum was investigated in relation to level of curriculum implementation and to perceived risks and/or benefits to status perquisites. Giacquinta's (1975a) status-risk theory of receptivity provides the theoretical framework for data analysis. Usable responses represented 82% (n = 280) of the population surveyed. The study found that both teachers and supervisors were highly receptive to the four modules of the Home and Career Skills curriculum and that there was a high level of implementation of the four curriculum modules. Receptivity was also shown to be related to the teachers' and supervisors' perception of status perquisite benefits. The major benefits perceived were self-esteem or competence, increased in-service education (training), availability of resources, confidence as an educator, and job security. The authors find that the status-risk theory of receptivity is an example of theories that could contribute to a better understanding of curriculum change in home economics and should be used in future studies.

家政学教师在全国课程改革中的地位、风险承担及接受程度
目前,纽约州七年级和八年级家庭经济学教师和主管对家庭和职业技能课程的四个模块的接受程度与课程实施水平、感知风险和/或地位特权的好处有关。Giacquinta (1975a)的可接受性状态-风险理论为数据分析提供了理论框架。可用的回答占被调查人口的82% (n = 280)。研究发现,教师和主管都高度接受家庭和职业技能课程的四个模块,并且四个课程模块的实施水平很高。接受度也与教师和主管对地位附带利益的感知有关。人们所认为的主要好处是自尊或能力、在职教育(培训)的增加、资源的可用性、作为教育者的信心和工作保障。作者发现,接受性的地位风险理论是一个理论的例子,可以有助于更好地理解家政课程的变化,应该在未来的研究中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信