Urban Chinese Parents' Perceptions of their Strengths and Needs in Rearing “Only” Sons and Daughters

Qing Xie, Francine Hultgren
{"title":"Urban Chinese Parents' Perceptions of their Strengths and Needs in Rearing “Only” Sons and Daughters","authors":"Qing Xie,&nbsp;Francine Hultgren","doi":"10.1177/0046777494223006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study sought to determine what Chinese urban parents perceived as their strengths and needs in rearing “only” children. The Parental Strengths and Needs Inventory was administered to a sample of 208 workers in the Special Iron &amp; Steel Company in Beijing, China, who were parents of only children from ages 6–13. Sixty Likert-type questions served to identify strengths and needs in 6 sub-areas: parent satisfaction, parent success, home teaching, parent difficulty, parent frustration, and information needs. The overwhelming majority of urban parents of only children reported that they possessed strengths in child rearing. However, the Chinese parents perceived differential strengths and needs in child rearing related to gender of parents (e.g., doing a good job as caregiver, letting the child enjoy free time) and gender of child (e.g., watching the development of self-confidence, overall parent frustration). Four conclusions were drawn from this study: (a) Parents perceived themselves to have strengths in only-child rearing; (b) mothers perceived themselves as more successful than fathers in only-child rearing; (c) parents of sons reported more child rearing frustrations and difficulties than parents of daughters; and (d) there appeared to be a cross-sex relationship (father-daughter; mother-son) in some areas of only-child rearing, particularly home teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":100610,"journal":{"name":"Home Economics Research Journal","volume":"22 3","pages":"340-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0046777494223006","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Economics Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1177/0046777494223006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This study sought to determine what Chinese urban parents perceived as their strengths and needs in rearing “only” children. The Parental Strengths and Needs Inventory was administered to a sample of 208 workers in the Special Iron & Steel Company in Beijing, China, who were parents of only children from ages 6–13. Sixty Likert-type questions served to identify strengths and needs in 6 sub-areas: parent satisfaction, parent success, home teaching, parent difficulty, parent frustration, and information needs. The overwhelming majority of urban parents of only children reported that they possessed strengths in child rearing. However, the Chinese parents perceived differential strengths and needs in child rearing related to gender of parents (e.g., doing a good job as caregiver, letting the child enjoy free time) and gender of child (e.g., watching the development of self-confidence, overall parent frustration). Four conclusions were drawn from this study: (a) Parents perceived themselves to have strengths in only-child rearing; (b) mothers perceived themselves as more successful than fathers in only-child rearing; (c) parents of sons reported more child rearing frustrations and difficulties than parents of daughters; and (d) there appeared to be a cross-sex relationship (father-daughter; mother-son) in some areas of only-child rearing, particularly home teaching.

中国城市父母在抚养“独生子女”方面的优势和需求认知
本研究试图确定中国城市父母在抚养“独生”子女方面的优势和需求。采用父母优势与需求量表对特铁工厂208名工人进行问卷调查。他们都是6-13岁独生子女的父母。60个李克特类型的问题用于确定6个子领域的优势和需求:父母满意度、父母成功、家庭教学、父母困难、父母挫折和信息需求。绝大多数城市独生子女父母报告说,他们在抚养孩子方面有优势。然而,中国父母认为父母性别(如做好照顾者,让孩子享受自由时间)和孩子性别(如观察自信的发展,父母整体的挫败感)在养育孩子方面存在差异。从这项研究中得出了四个结论:(a)父母认为自己在抚养独生子女方面有优势;(b)母亲认为自己在抚养独生子女方面比父亲更成功;(c)儿子的父母报告的养育子女的挫折和困难比女儿的父母多;(d)似乎存在一种异性关系(父女关系;母子)在某些方面是独生子女的养育方式,特别是家庭教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信