Relative Cost of Owning and Using Traditional and Innovative Cooking Appliances

Betty S. Young, Rebecca P. Lovingood, Rosemary C. Goss, Janet M. Johnson, Nancy A. Barclay, Walter F. O'Brien
{"title":"Relative Cost of Owning and Using Traditional and Innovative Cooking Appliances","authors":"Betty S. Young,&nbsp;Rebecca P. Lovingood,&nbsp;Rosemary C. Goss,&nbsp;Janet M. Johnson,&nbsp;Nancy A. Barclay,&nbsp;Walter F. O'Brien","doi":"10.1177/0046777494223005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A matrix was developed to provide a framework to organize information and compare the relative cost in monetary and human resources of owning and using traditional and innovative residential major cooking appliances. Laboratory data collected by the first author and by other university researchers with the same five types of cook tops and a microwave oven were analyzed with ANOVA, Student-Newman-Keuls, and Tukey's HDS procedures. Data were then used to complete the matrix comprising monetary and human resource dimensions thought to contribute to the total cost of ownership and use. Each dimension was assigned a weight to represent its level of importance to consumers. Based on the data, appliances were ranked high, medium, or low on each dimension of the matrix, and a total score was developed for each appliance. The microwave oven received the highest score, followed in order by cooktops with conventional gas burners, conventional electric coils, solid elements, and induction elements. Additional work is needed to refine data collection techniques, to expand the data set to include all types of major appliances currently available for surface cooking, and to validate the content and weights of the matrix.</p>","PeriodicalId":100610,"journal":{"name":"Home Economics Research Journal","volume":"22 3","pages":"324-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0046777494223005","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Economics Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1177/0046777494223005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A matrix was developed to provide a framework to organize information and compare the relative cost in monetary and human resources of owning and using traditional and innovative residential major cooking appliances. Laboratory data collected by the first author and by other university researchers with the same five types of cook tops and a microwave oven were analyzed with ANOVA, Student-Newman-Keuls, and Tukey's HDS procedures. Data were then used to complete the matrix comprising monetary and human resource dimensions thought to contribute to the total cost of ownership and use. Each dimension was assigned a weight to represent its level of importance to consumers. Based on the data, appliances were ranked high, medium, or low on each dimension of the matrix, and a total score was developed for each appliance. The microwave oven received the highest score, followed in order by cooktops with conventional gas burners, conventional electric coils, solid elements, and induction elements. Additional work is needed to refine data collection techniques, to expand the data set to include all types of major appliances currently available for surface cooking, and to validate the content and weights of the matrix.

拥有和使用传统和创新烹饪器具的相对成本
开发了一个矩阵,以提供一个框架来组织信息,并比较拥有和使用传统和创新住宅主要烹饪器具在金钱和人力资源方面的相对成本。第一作者和其他大学研究人员用相同的五种灶台和微波炉收集的实验室数据用方差分析、学生纽曼-克尔斯和杜克的HDS程序进行了分析。然后使用数据来完成矩阵,其中包括被认为有助于拥有和使用总成本的货币和人力资源方面。每个维度都被赋予了一个权重,以表示其对消费者的重要程度。根据这些数据,设备在矩阵的每个维度上被评为高、中或低,并为每个设备开发一个总分。微波炉获得了最高分,其次是传统燃气燃烧器、传统线圈、固体元件和感应元件的灶具。需要进一步的工作来改进数据收集技术,扩大数据集以包括目前可用于表面烹饪的所有类型的主要器具,并验证矩阵的内容和权重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信