Early Drug Therapy and In-Hospital Mortality following Acute Myocardial Infarction

P. Erne, D. Radovanović, P. Urban, J. Stauffer, O. Bertel, F. Gutzwiller
{"title":"Early Drug Therapy and In-Hospital Mortality following Acute Myocardial Infarction","authors":"P. Erne, D. Radovanović, P. Urban, J. Stauffer, O. Bertel, F. Gutzwiller","doi":"10.1159/000073838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Early drug therapy in patients with ST-elevation infarction is essential for improved short- and long-term outcomes. Most of the drugs used currently have been extensively studied in the era prior to reperfusion therapies, and thus it is important to assess the value of these drugs in today’s clinical practice and compare the results with those of randomized trials. Objectives: The study assessed the effects of age, gender, risk factors, reperfusion therapy and early drug therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation or new left bundle-branch block on in-hospital mortality. Methods: The analysis of drug administration and in-hospital mortality is based on the AMIS Plus project, a registry of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland since 1997. Data from 7,279 patients admitted to participating hospitals between 1997 and 2002 were analyzed, and the effect of factors and drug therapies on in-hospital mortality was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Results: Age and diabetes were identified as factors associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality, while a significant and important reduction of in-hospital mortality was due to the use of thrombolytic therapy or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [relative risk reduction (RRR) of 31%, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval: 0.69; 0.54–0.87; p = 0.002 for thrombolysis, RRR of 34%; OR 0.66; 0.44–0.99; p = 0.044 for PCI]. Early administration of aspirin or ADP antagonists is associated with a risk reduction of in-hospital mortality by 36% (OR 0.63; 0.45–0.89; p = 0.009) and 50% (OR 0.49; 0.35–0.70; p < 0.001), respectively. The use of unfractionated heparin did not reduce in-hospital mortality. Administration of ACE inhibitors, nitrates or beta-blockers reduced the relative risk of in-hospital death by 40% (OR 0.60; 0.49–0.75; p = 0.009), 42% (OR 0.58; 0.46–0.72; p < 0.001) and 54% (OR 0.46; 0.37–0.57; p < 0.001), respectively. Less frequent use of reperfusion therapies and beta-blockers was documented for older patients. Gender was not a determining factor for in-hospital survival. Conclusion: Early administration of aspirin or ADP inhibition with ticlopidine or clopidogrel as well as the early use of beta-blockers, nitrates and ACE inhibitors had a beneficial effect on in-hospital mortality in the reperfusion era with either thrombolytics or PCI. The association of a beneficial effect of ADP inhibition was more pronounced than that found in randomized trials for non-ST-elevation infarction. However, it cannot be excluded that patients with a lower risk for in-hospital death who were selected for early invasive assessment received more frequently ADP inhibitors and that this influenced this beneficial effect. Diabetes and age had negative effects on in-hospital mortality, and both reperfusion therapy and beta-blockers were much less frequently used in elderly patients.","PeriodicalId":87985,"journal":{"name":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","volume":"3 1","pages":"134 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000073838","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000073838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Early drug therapy in patients with ST-elevation infarction is essential for improved short- and long-term outcomes. Most of the drugs used currently have been extensively studied in the era prior to reperfusion therapies, and thus it is important to assess the value of these drugs in today’s clinical practice and compare the results with those of randomized trials. Objectives: The study assessed the effects of age, gender, risk factors, reperfusion therapy and early drug therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation or new left bundle-branch block on in-hospital mortality. Methods: The analysis of drug administration and in-hospital mortality is based on the AMIS Plus project, a registry of acute coronary syndromes in Switzerland since 1997. Data from 7,279 patients admitted to participating hospitals between 1997 and 2002 were analyzed, and the effect of factors and drug therapies on in-hospital mortality was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Results: Age and diabetes were identified as factors associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality, while a significant and important reduction of in-hospital mortality was due to the use of thrombolytic therapy or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [relative risk reduction (RRR) of 31%, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval: 0.69; 0.54–0.87; p = 0.002 for thrombolysis, RRR of 34%; OR 0.66; 0.44–0.99; p = 0.044 for PCI]. Early administration of aspirin or ADP antagonists is associated with a risk reduction of in-hospital mortality by 36% (OR 0.63; 0.45–0.89; p = 0.009) and 50% (OR 0.49; 0.35–0.70; p < 0.001), respectively. The use of unfractionated heparin did not reduce in-hospital mortality. Administration of ACE inhibitors, nitrates or beta-blockers reduced the relative risk of in-hospital death by 40% (OR 0.60; 0.49–0.75; p = 0.009), 42% (OR 0.58; 0.46–0.72; p < 0.001) and 54% (OR 0.46; 0.37–0.57; p < 0.001), respectively. Less frequent use of reperfusion therapies and beta-blockers was documented for older patients. Gender was not a determining factor for in-hospital survival. Conclusion: Early administration of aspirin or ADP inhibition with ticlopidine or clopidogrel as well as the early use of beta-blockers, nitrates and ACE inhibitors had a beneficial effect on in-hospital mortality in the reperfusion era with either thrombolytics or PCI. The association of a beneficial effect of ADP inhibition was more pronounced than that found in randomized trials for non-ST-elevation infarction. However, it cannot be excluded that patients with a lower risk for in-hospital death who were selected for early invasive assessment received more frequently ADP inhibitors and that this influenced this beneficial effect. Diabetes and age had negative effects on in-hospital mortality, and both reperfusion therapy and beta-blockers were much less frequently used in elderly patients.
急性心肌梗死后早期药物治疗与住院死亡率
背景:st段抬高性梗死患者的早期药物治疗对于改善短期和长期预后至关重要。目前使用的大多数药物在再灌注治疗之前的时代已经被广泛研究过,因此评估这些药物在当今临床实践中的价值并将结果与随机试验的结果进行比较是很重要的。目的:研究急性心肌梗死合并ST段抬高或新左束支传导阻滞患者的年龄、性别、危险因素、再灌注治疗及早期药物治疗对住院死亡率的影响。方法:药物管理和住院死亡率的分析基于AMIS Plus项目,这是瑞士自1997年以来的急性冠状动脉综合征登记。对1997 ~ 2002年7279例住院患者的资料进行分析,采用logistic回归分析评价因素和药物治疗对住院死亡率的影响。结果:年龄和糖尿病被确定为院内死亡可能性较高的相关因素,而院内死亡率的显著降低是由于使用溶栓治疗或原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)[相对风险降低(RRR)为31%,优势比(or)和95%置信区间:0.69;0.54 - -0.87;溶栓组p = 0.002, RRR为34%;或0.66;0.44 - -0.99;PCI组p = 0.044]。早期服用阿司匹林或ADP拮抗剂可使住院死亡率风险降低36% (or 0.63;0.45 - -0.89;p = 0.009)和50% (OR 0.49;0.35 - -0.70;P < 0.001)。使用未分级肝素并没有降低住院死亡率。应用ACE抑制剂、硝酸盐或受体阻滞剂可使院内死亡的相对风险降低40% (or 0.60;0.49 - -0.75;p = 0.009), 42% (OR 0.58;0.46 - -0.72;p < 0.001)和54% (OR 0.46;0.37 - -0.57;P < 0.001)。老年患者较少使用再灌注治疗和受体阻滞剂。性别不是住院生存的决定性因素。结论:早期给予阿司匹林或ADP抑制与噻氯匹定或氯吡格雷以及早期使用β受体阻滞剂、硝酸盐和ACE抑制剂对溶栓药或PCI再灌注期住院死亡率有有益影响。与非st段抬高性梗死的随机试验相比,ADP抑制的有益作用的关联更为明显。然而,不能排除选择进行早期侵入性评估的院内死亡风险较低的患者更频繁地使用ADP抑制剂,这影响了这种有益效果。糖尿病和年龄对住院死亡率有负面影响,老年患者使用再灌注治疗和-受体阻滞剂的频率要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信