Plasma Exchange for the Recurrence of Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Meta-Analysis

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
G. Vlachopanos, A. Georgalis, H. Gakiopoulou
{"title":"Plasma Exchange for the Recurrence of Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"G. Vlachopanos, A. Georgalis, H. Gakiopoulou","doi":"10.1155/2015/639628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Posttransplant recurrence of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) in the form of massive proteinuria is not uncommon and has detrimental consequences on renal allograft survival. A putative circulating permeability factor has been implicated in the pathogenesis leading to widespread use of plasma exchange (PLEX). We reviewed published studies to assess the role of PLEX on treatment of rFSGS in adults. Methods. Eligible manuscripts compared PLEX or variants with conventional care for inducing proteinuria remission (PR) in rFSGS and were identified through MEDLINE and reference lists. Data were abstracted in parallel by two reviewers. Results. We detected 6 nonrandomized studies with 117 cases enrolled. In a random effects model, the pooled risk ratio for the composite endpoint of partial or complete PR was 0,38 in favour of PLEX (95% CI: 0,23–0,61). No statistical heterogeneity was observed among included studies (I 2 = 0%, p = 0,42). On average, 9–26 PLEX sessions were performed to achieve PR. Renal allograft loss due to recurrence was lower (range: 0%–67%) in patients treated with PLEX. Conclusion. Notwithstanding the inherent limitations of small, observational trials, PLEX appears to be effective for PR in rFSGS. Additional research is needed to further elucidate its optimal use and impact on long-term allograft survival.","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/639628","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/639628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background. Posttransplant recurrence of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) in the form of massive proteinuria is not uncommon and has detrimental consequences on renal allograft survival. A putative circulating permeability factor has been implicated in the pathogenesis leading to widespread use of plasma exchange (PLEX). We reviewed published studies to assess the role of PLEX on treatment of rFSGS in adults. Methods. Eligible manuscripts compared PLEX or variants with conventional care for inducing proteinuria remission (PR) in rFSGS and were identified through MEDLINE and reference lists. Data were abstracted in parallel by two reviewers. Results. We detected 6 nonrandomized studies with 117 cases enrolled. In a random effects model, the pooled risk ratio for the composite endpoint of partial or complete PR was 0,38 in favour of PLEX (95% CI: 0,23–0,61). No statistical heterogeneity was observed among included studies (I 2 = 0%, p = 0,42). On average, 9–26 PLEX sessions were performed to achieve PR. Renal allograft loss due to recurrence was lower (range: 0%–67%) in patients treated with PLEX. Conclusion. Notwithstanding the inherent limitations of small, observational trials, PLEX appears to be effective for PR in rFSGS. Additional research is needed to further elucidate its optimal use and impact on long-term allograft survival.
血浆置换治疗成人肾移植受者原发性局灶节段性肾小球硬化复发:荟萃分析
背景。原发性局灶节段性肾小球硬化(rFSGS)在移植后以大量蛋白尿的形式复发并不罕见,并且对同种异体移植肾的存活具有不利影响。一种假定的循环渗透性因子与导致血浆置换(PLEX)广泛应用的发病机制有关。我们回顾了已发表的研究,以评估PLEX在成人rFSGS治疗中的作用。方法。符合条件的文献通过MEDLINE和参考文献列表将PLEX或变体与常规治疗在诱导rFSGS患者蛋白尿缓解(PR)方面进行了比较。数据由两位审稿人并行抽取。结果。我们发现了6项非随机研究,纳入了117例病例。在随机效应模型中,部分或完全PR的综合终点的合并风险比为0.38,有利于PLEX (95% CI: 0.23 - 0.61)。纳入研究间无统计学异质性(i2 = 0%, p = 0,42)。平均进行9-26次PLEX治疗以达到PR。在接受PLEX治疗的患者中,由于复发而导致的同种异体肾移植损失较低(范围:0%-67%)。结论。尽管小型观察性试验存在固有局限性,但PLEX似乎对rFSGS患者的PR有效。进一步的研究需要进一步阐明其最佳使用和对长期同种异体移植存活的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信