The capitalist virus

IF 2.1 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Politics Pub Date : 2022-11-07 DOI:10.1177/02633957221131754

Sandro Mezzadra, Brett Neilson

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Borders and mobilities have played key roles in the transformations of capitalism that have accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic. We attempt to distinguish novel developments in the control of movements of bodies, labour, and capital from processes of renationalisation, financialisation, and platformisation that were in train before the outbreak. Focusing on logistical techniques and technologies that govern the global circulation of people and things, this article explores the spatial shifts and ruptures that have marked the capitalist crisis occasioned by the pandemic. We give empirical attention to movements and struggles of migration in China, India, the Americas, and the Mediterranean.

查看原文本刊更多论文

资本主义病毒

在伴随COVID-19大流行的资本主义变革中，边界和流动性发挥了关键作用。我们试图将控制身体、劳动力和资本流动的新发展与疫情爆发前已在进行的再国有化、金融化和平台化过程区分开来。本文聚焦于控制人与物的全球流通的物流技术和技术，探讨了大流行引发的资本主义危机的空间转移和破裂。我们对中国、印度、美洲和地中海地区的移民运动和斗争给予实证关注。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Politics Multiple-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Politics publishes cutting-edge peer-reviewed analysis in politics and international studies. The ethos of Politics is the dissemination of timely, research-led reflections on the state of the art, the state of the world and the state of disciplinary pedagogy that make significant and original contributions to the disciplines of political and international studies. Politics is pluralist with regards to approaches, theories, methods, and empirical foci. Politics publishes articles from 4000 to 8000 words in length. We welcome 3 types of articles from scholars at all stages of their careers: Accessible presentations of state of the art research; Research-led analyses of contemporary events in politics or international relations; Theoretically informed and evidence-based research on learning and teaching in politics and international studies. We are open to articles providing accounts of where teaching innovation may have produced mixed results, so long as reasons why these results may have been mixed are analysed.