Is activation of autoreactive lymphocytes always detrimental? Viral infections and regulatory circuits in autoimmunity.

M. V. von Herrath, M. Oldstone, D. Homann, U. Christen
{"title":"Is activation of autoreactive lymphocytes always detrimental? Viral infections and regulatory circuits in autoimmunity.","authors":"M. V. von Herrath, M. Oldstone, D. Homann, U. Christen","doi":"10.1159/000060534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Viral infections are implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders through several mechanisms [1–12]. Many of these rely on the fact that potentially autoreactive but resting lymphocytes, which ‘escaped’ thymic negative selection, are present in the periphery of most individuals [13–16]. There are multiple ‘built-in’ safety mechanisms to prevent the activation of these cells under normal circumstances. However, an external inflammatory insult such as a viral infection leading to immune activation could disturb the carefully established equilibrium of self-tolerance [6, 17, 18]. Various virus-induced mechanisms that break ‘tolerance’ or ‘unresponsiveness’ to self are discussed in this chapter. However, direct evidence for viral infections causing autoimmune diseases has been difficult to obtain in humans. One reason is that humans are exposed to a multitude of infections during lifetime and therefore a direct causal association between a particular virus and a disease is hard to establish. The second reason is that viruses have the ability to mutate frequently and one strain can contain multiple different sequences (‘quasi-species’) that can differ in their diabetogenicity. Last, some viral infections disrupt autoimmune processes and provide, at least in experimental models, a cure from disease. Several animal models have been generated to create conditions under which viruses induce or dampen autoimmunity and to analyze the principles by which this can occur [19, 20]. These models serve as valuable tools for understanding","PeriodicalId":81058,"journal":{"name":"Current directions in autoimmunity","volume":"4 1","pages":"91-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000060534","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current directions in autoimmunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000060534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Viral infections are implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders through several mechanisms [1–12]. Many of these rely on the fact that potentially autoreactive but resting lymphocytes, which ‘escaped’ thymic negative selection, are present in the periphery of most individuals [13–16]. There are multiple ‘built-in’ safety mechanisms to prevent the activation of these cells under normal circumstances. However, an external inflammatory insult such as a viral infection leading to immune activation could disturb the carefully established equilibrium of self-tolerance [6, 17, 18]. Various virus-induced mechanisms that break ‘tolerance’ or ‘unresponsiveness’ to self are discussed in this chapter. However, direct evidence for viral infections causing autoimmune diseases has been difficult to obtain in humans. One reason is that humans are exposed to a multitude of infections during lifetime and therefore a direct causal association between a particular virus and a disease is hard to establish. The second reason is that viruses have the ability to mutate frequently and one strain can contain multiple different sequences (‘quasi-species’) that can differ in their diabetogenicity. Last, some viral infections disrupt autoimmune processes and provide, at least in experimental models, a cure from disease. Several animal models have been generated to create conditions under which viruses induce or dampen autoimmunity and to analyze the principles by which this can occur [19, 20]. These models serve as valuable tools for understanding
激活自身反应性淋巴细胞总是有害的吗?自身免疫中的病毒感染和调节回路。
病毒感染通过多种机制参与自身免疫性疾病的发病机制[1-12]。其中许多依赖于这样一个事实,即大多数个体的外周存在潜在的自身反应性但静止的淋巴细胞,这些淋巴细胞“逃脱”了胸腺阴性选择[13-16]。在正常情况下,有多种“内置”安全机制来防止这些细胞的激活。然而,外部炎症性损伤,如病毒感染导致免疫激活,可能会破坏精心建立的自我耐受平衡[6,17,18]。本章将讨论各种病毒诱导的机制,打破对自身的“耐受性”或“无反应性”。然而,在人类中很难获得病毒感染引起自身免疫性疾病的直接证据。其中一个原因是,人类在一生中会接触多种感染,因此很难确定某种特定病毒与某种疾病之间的直接因果关系。第二个原因是病毒具有频繁变异的能力,一个毒株可以包含多个不同的序列(“准物种”),这些序列在致糖尿病性方面可能不同。最后,一些病毒感染破坏自身免疫过程,至少在实验模型中,提供了一种治愈疾病的方法。已经建立了几种动物模型,以创造病毒诱导或抑制自身免疫的条件,并分析其发生的原理[19,20]。这些模型是有价值的理解工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信