Diagnostic hysteroscopy for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal patients.

M. V. van Trotsenburg, F. Wieser, F. Nagele
{"title":"Diagnostic hysteroscopy for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal patients.","authors":"M. V. van Trotsenburg, F. Wieser, F. Nagele","doi":"10.1159/000060284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this observational clinical study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy in premenopausal patients suffering from abnormal uterine bleeding. Between September 1996 and September 1999, 819 patients were referred to our outpatient hysteroscopy clinic, 317 of which were premenopausal, and presenting with menstrual symptoms. All hysteroscopies were performed using a standard 30 degrees 5-mm hysteroscope, and the uterine cavity was generally distended with normal saline. Hysteroscopy was completed successfully in 305 cases (96.2%), but since the routine use of lidocaine spray in 1998 this figure increased up to 98.9%. Intrauterine pathology was diagnosed in almost 34% of patients, the most frequent being submucous myomas (14%) and endometrial polyps (14%); there was no case of endometrial cancer in this subset of patients. Moreover, there was an age-related distribution of intrauterine pathology, with the highest incidence in patients aged 41-50 years. Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a simple and safe technique, well accepted by the vast majority of patients; due to its excellent diagnostic accuracy, and its high success rate as an outpatient procedure, we wonder why inpatient D&C under general anesthesia is still regarded a diagnostic or even therapeutic option for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.","PeriodicalId":75741,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to gynecology and obstetrics","volume":"20 1","pages":"21-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000060284","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to gynecology and obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000060284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The aim of this observational clinical study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy in premenopausal patients suffering from abnormal uterine bleeding. Between September 1996 and September 1999, 819 patients were referred to our outpatient hysteroscopy clinic, 317 of which were premenopausal, and presenting with menstrual symptoms. All hysteroscopies were performed using a standard 30 degrees 5-mm hysteroscope, and the uterine cavity was generally distended with normal saline. Hysteroscopy was completed successfully in 305 cases (96.2%), but since the routine use of lidocaine spray in 1998 this figure increased up to 98.9%. Intrauterine pathology was diagnosed in almost 34% of patients, the most frequent being submucous myomas (14%) and endometrial polyps (14%); there was no case of endometrial cancer in this subset of patients. Moreover, there was an age-related distribution of intrauterine pathology, with the highest incidence in patients aged 41-50 years. Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a simple and safe technique, well accepted by the vast majority of patients; due to its excellent diagnostic accuracy, and its high success rate as an outpatient procedure, we wonder why inpatient D&C under general anesthesia is still regarded a diagnostic or even therapeutic option for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
诊断性宫腔镜对绝经前患者异常子宫出血的研究。
本观察性临床研究的目的是评价门诊诊断宫腔镜在绝经前异常子宫出血患者中的可行性和诊断准确性。1996年9月至1999年9月期间,819名患者被转介到我们的门诊宫腔镜诊所,其中317名患者处于绝经前,并出现月经症状。所有宫腔镜均采用标准的30度5毫米宫腔镜,子宫腔一般用生理盐水扩张。宫腔镜检查成功完成305例(96.2%),但自1998年常规使用利多卡因喷雾以来,这一数字上升至98.9%。近34%的患者有宫内病理诊断,最常见的是粘膜下肌瘤(14%)和子宫内膜息肉(14%);在这组患者中没有一例子宫内膜癌。此外,宫内病理具有年龄相关性,41-50岁患者发病率最高。诊断性宫腔镜是一种简单、安全的技术,被绝大多数患者所接受;由于其出色的诊断准确性和作为门诊手术的高成功率,我们想知道为什么全麻下的住院D&C仍然被视为异常子宫出血患者的诊断甚至治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信