A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in isolated wetlands in Georgia, USA

Anna L. Farmer, L. Smith, S. Castleberry, J. Gibbons
{"title":"A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in isolated wetlands in Georgia, USA","authors":"Anna L. Farmer, L. Smith, S. Castleberry, J. Gibbons","doi":"10.1163/157075309X12470350858433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the effectiveness of five amphibian sampling methods in nine isolated wetlands in Baker County, Georgia, USA. Overall, aquatic funnel traps yielded the most species, although the number detected using frogloggers (automated frog call recording devices), funnel traps, dipnetting, and PVC pipe refugia was not significantly different among sampling techniques. We detected the same median number of species with funnel traps and frogloggers as with all five methods combined. Methods varied widely in their detection probabilities for individual species and life stages. Species occupancy estimates were strongly affected by method choice. Our results suggest that a combination of methods and prolonged sampling periods are necessary to detect the large number of species present in southeastern isolated wetlands. We recommend that future amphibian surveys in these habitats use a combination of floating funnel traps, frogloggers, and crayfish traps as sampling methods when an assessment of species richness is the objective of a study.","PeriodicalId":55499,"journal":{"name":"Applied Herpetology","volume":"6 1","pages":"327-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/157075309X12470350858433","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/157075309X12470350858433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of five amphibian sampling methods in nine isolated wetlands in Baker County, Georgia, USA. Overall, aquatic funnel traps yielded the most species, although the number detected using frogloggers (automated frog call recording devices), funnel traps, dipnetting, and PVC pipe refugia was not significantly different among sampling techniques. We detected the same median number of species with funnel traps and frogloggers as with all five methods combined. Methods varied widely in their detection probabilities for individual species and life stages. Species occupancy estimates were strongly affected by method choice. Our results suggest that a combination of methods and prolonged sampling periods are necessary to detect the large number of species present in southeastern isolated wetlands. We recommend that future amphibian surveys in these habitats use a combination of floating funnel traps, frogloggers, and crayfish traps as sampling methods when an assessment of species richness is the objective of a study.
美国乔治亚州孤立湿地两栖动物取样技术比较
在美国乔治亚州贝克县的9个孤立湿地中,比较了5种两栖动物取样方法的有效性。总体而言,水生漏斗陷阱捕获的物种最多,尽管使用青蛙记录器(自动青蛙呼叫记录设备)、漏斗陷阱、浸液和PVC管避难所检测到的物种数量在采样技术之间没有显著差异。我们用漏斗诱捕器和蛙捕器检测到的中位数物种数量与这五种方法的总和相同。不同的方法对不同的物种和生命阶段的检测概率差别很大。物种占用率估计受方法选择的强烈影响。我们的研究结果表明,要检测东南部孤立湿地中存在的大量物种,需要结合多种方法和延长采样周期。我们建议未来在这些栖息地的两栖动物调查中,当评估物种丰富度是一项研究的目标时,使用浮动漏斗陷阱、蛙人陷阱和小龙虾陷阱的组合作为采样方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信