The osce’s Mediation in the Transdniestrian Settlement Process: Challenges of Third Party Engagement in a Post-Soviet Environment

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Security and Human Rights Pub Date : 2016-09-09 DOI:10.1163/18750230-02703012

R. Cristescu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on challenges to peace mediation in the post-Soviet context by looking at the the case study of the Transdniestrian (TD) settlement process. It offers a brief overview of the OSCE led TD process and aims to explain why the conflict has failed to “respond” to the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) led mediation efforts. Highlighting key process design shortcomings, the article offers a series of recommendations to practitioners to improve mediation processes in the OSCE context.

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧安组织在德涅斯特河沿岸解决进程中的调解:后苏联环境下第三方参与的挑战

本文通过对德涅斯特河流域(TD)和解进程的案例研究，重点关注后苏联背景下和平调解面临的挑战。它简要概述了欧洲安全与合作组织(OSCE)领导的维和进程，并旨在解释为什么冲突未能对欧洲安全与合作组织(OSCE)领导的调解努力做出“回应”。本文强调了流程设计的主要缺陷，并向从业者提供了一系列建议，以改进欧安组织背景下的调解流程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Security and Human Rights Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Security and Human Rights (formerly Helsinki Monitor) is a quarterly journal devoted to issues inspired by the work and principles of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). It looks at the challenge of building security through cooperation across the northern hemisphere, from Vancouver to Vladivostok, as well as how this experience can be applied to other parts of the world. It aims to stimulate thinking on the question of protecting and promoting human rights in a world faced with serious threats to security.