{"title":"Book Reviews : SUMIT SARKAR, Beyond Nationalist Frames, Delhi, Permanent Black, 2002, pp. 265","authors":"G. Prakash","doi":"10.1177/001946460404100305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What’s eating Sumit Sarkar? The present collection provides an answer. Like his previous volume of essays, Writing Social History ( 1999), Beyond Nationalist Frames suggests that Sarkar is very troubled by postmodernism, the ’Saidian turn’ in colonial and post-colonial studies, the various follies of Subaltern Studies (though he too was once a Subaltern recruit), and the rise of Hindutva. Of course, no one writes outside his or her worldly context, as Edward Said argued so insistently and compellingly, but so great is Sarkar’s worry with contemporary political and intellectual trends that it dominates his writings. Beyond Nationalist Frames contains essays that are united, according to the author, by a concern with ’the vicissitudes of our times, at once political and academic’ (p. 1). These include the advance of Hindutva, globalised capitalism, the post-Marxist and postmodernist moods, and the shift from social history to cultural studies. Together, these have imposed a colonial/anti-colonial binary, valorised concepts of indigenism and cultural authenticity, and led to facile critiques of Western discourses as mere instruments of alien hegemony. Writing against these surely indefensible ideas, Sarkar presents himself as an historian with an ’unfashionable","PeriodicalId":45806,"journal":{"name":"Indian Economic and Social History Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"339 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001946460404100305","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Economic and Social History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460404100305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
What’s eating Sumit Sarkar? The present collection provides an answer. Like his previous volume of essays, Writing Social History ( 1999), Beyond Nationalist Frames suggests that Sarkar is very troubled by postmodernism, the ’Saidian turn’ in colonial and post-colonial studies, the various follies of Subaltern Studies (though he too was once a Subaltern recruit), and the rise of Hindutva. Of course, no one writes outside his or her worldly context, as Edward Said argued so insistently and compellingly, but so great is Sarkar’s worry with contemporary political and intellectual trends that it dominates his writings. Beyond Nationalist Frames contains essays that are united, according to the author, by a concern with ’the vicissitudes of our times, at once political and academic’ (p. 1). These include the advance of Hindutva, globalised capitalism, the post-Marxist and postmodernist moods, and the shift from social history to cultural studies. Together, these have imposed a colonial/anti-colonial binary, valorised concepts of indigenism and cultural authenticity, and led to facile critiques of Western discourses as mere instruments of alien hegemony. Writing against these surely indefensible ideas, Sarkar presents himself as an historian with an ’unfashionable
期刊介绍:
For over 35 years, The Indian Economic and Social History Review has been a meeting ground for scholars whose concerns span diverse cultural and political themes with a bearing on social and economic history. The Indian Economic and Social History Review is the foremost journal devoted to the study of the social and economic history of India, and South Asia more generally. The journal publishes articles with a wider coverage, referring to other Asian countries but of interest to those working on Indian history. Its articles cover India"s South Asian neighbours so as to provide a comparative perspective.