Refractory Status Epilepticus: Experience in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
O. Hernández, J. Zapata, M. Jiménez, M. Massaro, A. Guerra, J. Arango, J. Ciro, H. Delgado, J. Suarez
{"title":"Refractory Status Epilepticus: Experience in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit","authors":"O. Hernández, J. Zapata, M. Jiménez, M. Massaro, A. Guerra, J. Arango, J. Ciro, H. Delgado, J. Suarez","doi":"10.1155/2014/821462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) has significant morbidity and mortality, and its management requires an accurate diagnosis and aggressive treatment. Objectives. To describe the experience of management of RSE in a neurological intensive care unit (NeuroICU) and determine predictors of short-term clinical outcome. Methods. We reviewed cases of RSE from September 2007 to December 2008. Management was titrated to findings on continuous video EEG (cVEEG). We collected patients’ demographics, RSE etiology, characteristics of seizures, cVEEG findings, treatments, and short-term outcome. Control of RSE was to achieve burst suppression pattern or electrographic cessation of ictal activity. Results. We included 80 patients; 63.8% were in coma, 25% had subclinical seizures, and 11.3% had focal activity. 51.3% were male and mean age was 45 years. Etiology was neurological lesion in 75.1%, uncontrolled epilepsy in 20%, and systemic derangements in 4.9%. 78.8% were treated with general anesthesia and concomitant anticonvulsant drugs. The control of RSE was 87.5% of patients. In-hospital mortality was 22.5%. The factors associated with unfavorable short-term outcome were coma and age over 60 years. Conclusions. RSE management guided by cVEEG is associated with a good seizure control. A multidisciplinary approach can help achieve a better short-term functional outcome in noncomatose patients.","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"2014 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/821462","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/821462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction. Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) has significant morbidity and mortality, and its management requires an accurate diagnosis and aggressive treatment. Objectives. To describe the experience of management of RSE in a neurological intensive care unit (NeuroICU) and determine predictors of short-term clinical outcome. Methods. We reviewed cases of RSE from September 2007 to December 2008. Management was titrated to findings on continuous video EEG (cVEEG). We collected patients’ demographics, RSE etiology, characteristics of seizures, cVEEG findings, treatments, and short-term outcome. Control of RSE was to achieve burst suppression pattern or electrographic cessation of ictal activity. Results. We included 80 patients; 63.8% were in coma, 25% had subclinical seizures, and 11.3% had focal activity. 51.3% were male and mean age was 45 years. Etiology was neurological lesion in 75.1%, uncontrolled epilepsy in 20%, and systemic derangements in 4.9%. 78.8% were treated with general anesthesia and concomitant anticonvulsant drugs. The control of RSE was 87.5% of patients. In-hospital mortality was 22.5%. The factors associated with unfavorable short-term outcome were coma and age over 60 years. Conclusions. RSE management guided by cVEEG is associated with a good seizure control. A multidisciplinary approach can help achieve a better short-term functional outcome in noncomatose patients.
顽固性癫痫持续状态:在神经重症监护室的经验
介绍。难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)具有显著的发病率和死亡率,其管理需要准确的诊断和积极的治疗。目标。描述在神经重症监护室(NeuroICU)管理RSE的经验,并确定短期临床结果的预测因素。方法。我们回顾了2007年9月至2008年12月期间的RSE病例。根据连续视频脑电图(cVEEG)结果进行管理。我们收集了患者的人口统计资料、RSE病因、癫痫发作特征、cVEEG结果、治疗方法和短期结果。RSE的控制是达到突发抑制模式或电图停止发作活动。结果。我们纳入了80例患者;63.8%为昏迷,25%为亚临床发作,11.3%为局灶性活动。51.3%为男性,平均年龄45岁。病因为神经损伤占75.1%,不受控制的癫痫占20%,全身性紊乱占4.9%。78.8%的患者采用全身麻醉并同时使用抗惊厥药物。RSE控制率为87.5%。住院死亡率为22.5%。与不良短期预后相关的因素是昏迷和年龄超过60岁。结论。cVEEG指导下的RSE管理与良好的癫痫发作控制相关。多学科的方法可以帮助非昏迷患者获得更好的短期功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Journal of Critical Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信