Anxiety Fiction: Domestic Poisoning in Early Modern News, Arden of Faversham, and Hamlet

IF 0.1 N/A MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
D. Stymeist
{"title":"Anxiety Fiction: Domestic Poisoning in Early Modern News, Arden of Faversham, and Hamlet","authors":"D. Stymeist","doi":"10.1163/23526963-04101002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to the representational copia surrounding poisoning, critics have tended to focus on how early modern writers adopted Italianate settings and characters due to the pervasive correlation between poison and Italy in England's cultural imagination. This critical preoccupation has led to an undervaluing of the role that domestic English news depictions of poison played in the construction of criminality. Contemporary media theorizations concerning the commercial uses of fear help unpack how early modern news reports depicted the threat of household poisoning out of proportion to actual risk in order to profit from developing public anxiety. Popular drama, as evidenced in Arden of Faversham and Hamlet, responded to the news media's commercialization of fear by creating its own set of \"anxiety fictions\" that were crucial in defining deviancy and proliferating public apprehension. Ultimately, various forms of cultural media reinforced public fears surrounding the threat of domestic subversion and concomitantly had a negative effect on social and legal policy.","PeriodicalId":55910,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Renaissance Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23526963-04101002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in Renaissance Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23526963-04101002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the representational copia surrounding poisoning, critics have tended to focus on how early modern writers adopted Italianate settings and characters due to the pervasive correlation between poison and Italy in England's cultural imagination. This critical preoccupation has led to an undervaluing of the role that domestic English news depictions of poison played in the construction of criminality. Contemporary media theorizations concerning the commercial uses of fear help unpack how early modern news reports depicted the threat of household poisoning out of proportion to actual risk in order to profit from developing public anxiety. Popular drama, as evidenced in Arden of Faversham and Hamlet, responded to the news media's commercialization of fear by creating its own set of "anxiety fictions" that were crucial in defining deviancy and proliferating public apprehension. Ultimately, various forms of cultural media reinforced public fears surrounding the threat of domestic subversion and concomitantly had a negative effect on social and legal policy.
焦虑小说:近代早期新闻中的家庭中毒,《法弗舍姆的雅顿》和《哈姆雷特》
作为对中毒的再现性模仿的回应,评论家们倾向于关注早期现代作家如何采用意大利式的背景和人物,因为在英国的文化想象中,毒药和意大利之间普遍存在关联。这种批判性的关注导致低估了英国国内新闻对毒药的描述在犯罪建构中所起的作用。当代媒体关于恐惧的商业用途的理论有助于揭示早期现代新闻报道如何将家庭中毒的威胁与实际风险不成比例地描述,以便从公众的焦虑中获利。流行戏剧,如《法弗舍姆的阿登》和《哈姆雷特》所证明的那样,通过创造自己的一套“焦虑小说”来回应新闻媒体对恐惧的商业化,这些小说在定义变态和扩散公众忧虑方面至关重要。最终,各种形式的文化媒介加强了公众对国内颠覆威胁的恐惧,并随之对社会和法律政策产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Explorations in Renaissance Culture
Explorations in Renaissance Culture MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信