Curriculum Studies and Transnational Flows and Mobilities: Feminist Autobiographical Perspectives

IF 0.3
Janet L. Miller
{"title":"Curriculum Studies and Transnational Flows and Mobilities: Feminist Autobiographical Perspectives","authors":"Janet L. Miller","doi":"10.1163/9789087909482_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I here consider possible effects of global flows, transnational connections, and transcultural interactions on attempts to construct a worldwide curriculum studies field. These flows and mobilities loosen local populations from geographically constrained communities, connecting people and places around the globe in new and complex ways. Thus, they dramatically alter not only processes of curriculum construction and theorizing but also ways in which a worldwide curriculum studies field might be conceptualized and enacted. I argue that these flows and mobilities point to a necessary conceptualization of a worldwide curriculum studies field as always in the making. \n I briefly review perspectives on global flows and mobilities that currently circulate among a variety of academic disciplines. I then examine various feminists’ transnational, poststructural, postcolonial, and queer theorizing and practices in order to articulate tensions and possibilities for a worldwide curriculum studies field affected by transnational flows and mobilities. Particular feminist work especially draws attention to political, social, economic, and environmental biases and injustices that flows and mobilities have shaped and sustained. I argue that these feminists’ interrogations could contribute to curriculum scholars’ negotiations of cultural, geographical, linguistic, and theoretical differences across a worldwide curriculum studies field. \n In particular, I autobiographically explore feminist examinations of transnational flows and mobilities as one possible means to hold varying perspectives on these phenomena in simultaneous yet often tension-filled relation to one another. Conceptions of transnational flows and mobilities become visceral through embodied autobiographical inquiries that take into account shifting and rapidly changing discursive and material effects of globalization. These effects include knowledges and identities produced at everyday educational sites as well as within the potentials of a worldwide curriculum studies field.","PeriodicalId":40918,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Curriculum Inquiry","volume":"3 1","pages":"31-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Curriculum Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909482_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

I here consider possible effects of global flows, transnational connections, and transcultural interactions on attempts to construct a worldwide curriculum studies field. These flows and mobilities loosen local populations from geographically constrained communities, connecting people and places around the globe in new and complex ways. Thus, they dramatically alter not only processes of curriculum construction and theorizing but also ways in which a worldwide curriculum studies field might be conceptualized and enacted. I argue that these flows and mobilities point to a necessary conceptualization of a worldwide curriculum studies field as always in the making. I briefly review perspectives on global flows and mobilities that currently circulate among a variety of academic disciplines. I then examine various feminists’ transnational, poststructural, postcolonial, and queer theorizing and practices in order to articulate tensions and possibilities for a worldwide curriculum studies field affected by transnational flows and mobilities. Particular feminist work especially draws attention to political, social, economic, and environmental biases and injustices that flows and mobilities have shaped and sustained. I argue that these feminists’ interrogations could contribute to curriculum scholars’ negotiations of cultural, geographical, linguistic, and theoretical differences across a worldwide curriculum studies field. In particular, I autobiographically explore feminist examinations of transnational flows and mobilities as one possible means to hold varying perspectives on these phenomena in simultaneous yet often tension-filled relation to one another. Conceptions of transnational flows and mobilities become visceral through embodied autobiographical inquiries that take into account shifting and rapidly changing discursive and material effects of globalization. These effects include knowledges and identities produced at everyday educational sites as well as within the potentials of a worldwide curriculum studies field.
课程研究与跨国流动:女性主义自传体视角
我在这里考虑全球流动、跨国联系和跨文化互动对构建世界性课程研究领域的可能影响。这些流动和流动使当地人口从地理上受限制的社区中解脱出来,以新的复杂方式将全球各地的人和地方联系起来。因此,它们不仅极大地改变了课程建设和理论化的过程,而且也改变了全球课程研究领域的概念和实施方式。我认为,这些流动和流动表明,全球课程研究领域的必要概念化一直在形成中。我简要回顾了目前在各种学科中流传的关于全球流动和流动性的观点。然后,我考察了各种女权主义者的跨国、后结构、后殖民和酷儿理论和实践,以阐明受跨国流动和流动影响的全球课程研究领域的紧张关系和可能性。特别的女权主义作品特别关注流动和流动所形成和维持的政治、社会、经济和环境偏见和不公正。我认为,这些女权主义者的质疑可能有助于课程学者在全球课程研究领域对文化、地理、语言和理论差异的谈判。特别是,我在自传中探讨了跨国流动和流动的女权主义研究,作为一种可能的手段,以不同的视角看待这些现象,同时又经常充满紧张的相互关系。跨国流动和流动的概念通过具体化的自传式调查变得发自内心,这些调查考虑到全球化的变化和迅速变化的话语和物质影响。这些影响包括在日常教育场所以及在全球课程研究领域的潜力中产生的知识和身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transnational Curriculum Inquiry
Transnational Curriculum Inquiry EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信