Theorizing ICT4D Research

Q2 Social Sciences
R. Heeks
{"title":"Theorizing ICT4D Research","authors":"R. Heeks","doi":"10.1162/ITID.2007.3.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this special issue is to show how theoretical ideas from the social sciences can be applied to researching ICTs and socioeconomic development. Why should this be needed? Because the explosion of work on ICTs for development (ICT4D) has (unconsciously) followed Marx’s dictum: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world differently; the point is, to change it.” There has been a bias to action, not a bias to knowledge. We are changing the world without interpreting or understanding it. Most of the ICT4D research being produced is therefore descriptive not analytical. It might make some interesting points but it lacks sufacient rigor to make its andings credible and it can often be repetitive of earlier work. It has a close-to-zero shelf life. The pictorial analogy of such work is that of stones being thrown into a pond, each one making a ripple but then sinking without trace. Instead, it would be better if each “stone” was placed on a cairn, building on what has come before and acting as a foundation for future work. Such a contribution is generally possible only where the research draws on some preexisting conceptual framework. Of course, there are existing and ongoing research foundations for ICT4D work, which we can and particularly in various factions of “informatics”:","PeriodicalId":45625,"journal":{"name":"Information Technologies & International Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"161","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technologies & International Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/ITID.2007.3.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 161

Abstract

The aim of this special issue is to show how theoretical ideas from the social sciences can be applied to researching ICTs and socioeconomic development. Why should this be needed? Because the explosion of work on ICTs for development (ICT4D) has (unconsciously) followed Marx’s dictum: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world differently; the point is, to change it.” There has been a bias to action, not a bias to knowledge. We are changing the world without interpreting or understanding it. Most of the ICT4D research being produced is therefore descriptive not analytical. It might make some interesting points but it lacks sufacient rigor to make its andings credible and it can often be repetitive of earlier work. It has a close-to-zero shelf life. The pictorial analogy of such work is that of stones being thrown into a pond, each one making a ripple but then sinking without trace. Instead, it would be better if each “stone” was placed on a cairn, building on what has come before and acting as a foundation for future work. Such a contribution is generally possible only where the research draws on some preexisting conceptual framework. Of course, there are existing and ongoing research foundations for ICT4D work, which we can and particularly in various factions of “informatics”:
ICT4D研究理论化
本期特刊的目的是展示如何将社会科学的理论思想应用于研究信息通信技术和社会经济发展。为什么需要这样做呢?因为信息通信技术促进发展(ICT4D)工作的爆炸式增长(无意识地)遵循了马克思的格言:“哲学家只是以不同的方式解释世界;关键是要改变它。”有一种对行动的偏见,而不是对知识的偏见。我们在没有解释或理解的情况下改变着世界。因此,ICT4D的大部分研究都是描述性的,而不是分析性的。它可能会提出一些有趣的观点,但它缺乏足够的严谨性,使其结论可信,而且它往往是早期工作的重复。它的保质期几乎为零。这种工作的形象类比是石头被扔进池塘,每一块石头都激起涟漪,但随后又沉入水中,不留痕迹。相反,如果把每一块“石头”放在一个石堆上,在以前的基础上建立起来,并作为未来工作的基础,情况会更好。这样的贡献通常只有在研究利用了一些预先存在的概念框架的情况下才有可能。当然,ICT4D工作有现有的和正在进行的研究基础,我们可以,特别是在“信息学”的各个派别:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Technologies & International Development
Information Technologies & International Development INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信