Great Media and Communication Debates: WSIS and the MacBride Report

Q2 Social Sciences
R. Mansell, K. Nordenstreng
{"title":"Great Media and Communication Debates: WSIS and the MacBride Report","authors":"R. Mansell, K. Nordenstreng","doi":"10.1162/ITID.2007.3.4.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1980 UNESCO published Many Voices, One World, the report of its International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems, also known as the MacBride Report, after the commission’s chair, Sean MacBride, the Irish statesman and peace and human rights activist.1 In 2004, in an acknowledgment of its importance in current debates about the evolution of information societies, Rowman & Littleaeld republished it. Many Voices, One World was a groundbreaking report and became a milestone in the discussions that had been ongoing since the 1970s. We examine its insights in the light of debates leading up and subsequent to the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in Geneva in 2003 and Tunis in 2005. We argue that many of the issues and dilemmas highlighted by the MacBride Report’s authors exist today. The record of WSIS participants in tackling these issues is unfortunately little better than that of those who sought to inouence debates about media and communication some twenty-ave years ago. Although there has been much talk in the intervening years, there are few signs that international debates and diplomatic mechanisms are fostering the equitable development of the media and communication environment that is so crucial for the emergence of information societies in the twenty-arst century. There is a profusion of smaller and larger initiatives aimed at reducing various social and economic inequalities including those associated with the media and communication industries. In our view, however, it is unlikely that the new institutional forums that have emerged since the WSIS will be equal to addressing sources of inequality in areas such as governance, anancing, media diversity, freedom of speech, and human rights. Nevertheless, and partly as a result of the WSIS dialogue, participants in civil society are becoming better informed about the issues involved. Whereas the WSIS, as the MacBride Commission before it, failed to galvanize private and public sector participants into action to promote the massive investment that is needed, the WSIS process did heighten the proale of core international media and communication issues in many key international forums. It also conarmed the need to address these issues through multilateral platforms that encompass all stakeholders, including civil society actors.","PeriodicalId":45625,"journal":{"name":"Information Technologies & International Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technologies & International Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/ITID.2007.3.4.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

In 1980 UNESCO published Many Voices, One World, the report of its International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems, also known as the MacBride Report, after the commission’s chair, Sean MacBride, the Irish statesman and peace and human rights activist.1 In 2004, in an acknowledgment of its importance in current debates about the evolution of information societies, Rowman & Littleaeld republished it. Many Voices, One World was a groundbreaking report and became a milestone in the discussions that had been ongoing since the 1970s. We examine its insights in the light of debates leading up and subsequent to the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in Geneva in 2003 and Tunis in 2005. We argue that many of the issues and dilemmas highlighted by the MacBride Report’s authors exist today. The record of WSIS participants in tackling these issues is unfortunately little better than that of those who sought to inouence debates about media and communication some twenty-ave years ago. Although there has been much talk in the intervening years, there are few signs that international debates and diplomatic mechanisms are fostering the equitable development of the media and communication environment that is so crucial for the emergence of information societies in the twenty-arst century. There is a profusion of smaller and larger initiatives aimed at reducing various social and economic inequalities including those associated with the media and communication industries. In our view, however, it is unlikely that the new institutional forums that have emerged since the WSIS will be equal to addressing sources of inequality in areas such as governance, anancing, media diversity, freedom of speech, and human rights. Nevertheless, and partly as a result of the WSIS dialogue, participants in civil society are becoming better informed about the issues involved. Whereas the WSIS, as the MacBride Commission before it, failed to galvanize private and public sector participants into action to promote the massive investment that is needed, the WSIS process did heighten the proale of core international media and communication issues in many key international forums. It also conarmed the need to address these issues through multilateral platforms that encompass all stakeholders, including civil society actors.
伟大的媒体和传播辩论:WSIS和麦克布莱德报告
1980年,联合国教科文组织出版了其国际传播问题研究委员会的报告《多种声音,一个世界》,也被称为《麦克布赖德报告》,以该委员会主席、爱尔兰政治家、和平与人权活动家肖恩·麦克布赖德的名字命名2004年,为了认识到它在当前关于信息社会演变的辩论中的重要性,罗曼和利特菲尔德重新出版了这本书。《多种声音,同一个世界》是一份开创性的报告,成为自上世纪70年代以来一直在进行的讨论的里程碑。在2003年日内瓦和2005年突尼斯举行的信息社会世界峰会(WSIS)之前和之后的辩论中,我们考察了它的见解。我们认为,麦克布赖德报告作者强调的许多问题和困境今天仍然存在。不幸的是,WSIS与会者在解决这些问题方面的记录,并不比二十多年前那些试图影响有关媒体和传播辩论的人好多少。虽然在这期间进行了许多讨论,但几乎没有迹象表明,国际辩论和外交机制正在促进媒体和传播环境的公平发展,而这对21世纪信息社会的出现是至关重要的。有许多大大小小的倡议旨在减少各种社会和经济不平等现象,包括与媒体和通信行业有关的不平等现象。然而,我们认为,自WSIS以来出现的新机构论坛不太可能在治理、融资、媒体多样性、言论自由和人权等领域解决不平等的根源问题。然而,部分由于WSIS对话的结果,民间社会的参与者对所涉及的问题有了更好的了解。与之前的麦克布赖德委员会一样,WSIS未能激励私营和公共部门的参与者采取行动,促进所需的大规模投资,但WSIS进程确实在许多重要的国际论坛上提高了核心国际媒体和传播问题的重要性。它还确认需要通过包括民间社会行动者在内的所有利益攸关方的多边平台来解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Technologies & International Development
Information Technologies & International Development INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信